Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
Manuel Camblor wrote:Maybe I'm reading you wrongly
Manuel Camblor wrote:but your classification almost makes it sound like the three types of Argentinian Malbec (I won't deny they exist, but...) are somehow all represented eqally across the spectrum.
Neil Courtney
Wine guru
3257
Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:39 pm
Auckland, New Zealand
Manuel Camblor wrote:By the way, why does this thing not accept the picture from my collection that I wasnt to put up as my "avatar"? I've tried it three times, but can't get what I want to come up. Will I have to be an SR-71 again?
Robin Garr wrote:Can't it be both? From Argentina, I find that we get about three broad categories: Fine, Euro-style wines with complexity and a minerality that's consistent enough across brands to rank as terroir; over-oaked el Parkerismo fruit bombs; and overcropped, bland and insipid mass-market stuff. Will the real Malbec please stand up?
On the whole, though, there's enough of the first category to keep me coming back for more.
I almost bought it, to see if it bore any resemblance to all those former-clarets Mr. Rolland has been so kind to mess up for me in the past decade.
But then I thought better of it...
Sue wrote:have any of you tried the Trapiche Single Vineyard Malbecs
Sue Courtney wrote:Are you able to expand on what you mean by minerality in the Malbec context? I was going to start a thread on minerality in a couple of days time, so I can do that now if you like as I don't want a discussion on minerality lost in a thread about Malbec, although I am interested in interpretation of minerality in Malbec in this thread.
Robin Garr wrote:Did you happen to catch my rumination, Mud-pie memories, just the other day, Sue? It went pretty much right where you're headed, I think. To me, I find a distinct "red clay" element in some cheap Malbecs that I love and that raises them head-and-shoulders above the pack.
Sue Courtney wrote:To me red clay is iron-rich clay, so do you find the Malbecs you speak of as having this minerality have a ferric aspect to them?
BTW, I find clay a much more meaningful descriptor because at least clays have smell and taste - as any kid would know and you allude to this in your mud pie memories.
2003 Michel Rolland Clos de Los Siete (Mendoza, Argentina) - $16 Malbec (40), cab/syrah/merlot (20 each). Very rich, highly concentrated black fruit and chocolate with good chalky tannins and plenty of toasted wood but a very processed and filtered feel.
Sue Courtney wrote:Robin, Manuel, Bill and anyone else - have any of you tried the Trapiche Single Vineyard Malbecs? I haven't but a report from a colleague from was highly flattering. Trying to source some of the wines to try for myself.
Manuel wrote:But seriously, a very processed feel? From a Roland wine? How is that possible?
Manuel Camblor wrote:Sue Courtney wrote:Robin, Manuel, Bill and anyone else - have any of you tried the Trapiche Single Vineyard Malbecs? I haven't but a report from a colleague from was highly flattering. Trying to source some of the wines to try for myself.
Yes. The longer version of my impressions involves several dozen expletives which may offend the easily offensible (some of them, as far as I can tell, neologisms), and which I shall not reproduce in this family oriented forum. Of course, I do have a short version, which went sort of like: "Why do people make this sort of crap???!!!"
Triple-Eeeek!
David Lole wrote:From an Australian perspective, I regard Malbec as good for blending only. It does very well in the Clare Valley. Leasingham and Wendouree have produved some great Cabernet Malbecs/Shiraz Malbecs for decades now. I've often associated an offputting "earthy/turnipy" character with Malbec grown in Australia. Seemingly, very little of it is grown/used in Bordeaux. I have no experience with Malbec's from South America or anywhere else for that matter.
Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, ByteSpider, Google IPMatch and 3 guests