The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.
no avatar



NOT David Caruso




Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:17 pm


Albany, New York

Decanter's maturity ranges - they seem crazy

by Covert » Wed Nov 15, 2006 7:10 pm

The latest Decanter rates some 1998 Bordeaux and gives their plateau opinions. Since they are sort of beginning to come of age, I was anxious to learn their opinion of how far in the future I should consider drinking my one and only 1998 Lafite.

They pegged the maturity plateau at between 3 and 5 years from now. What!? I figured they must mean that the bottle should be considered for first opening sometime in that range, not that 1998 Lafite will start to fade within two years of when it becomes drinkable. So I looked at other rated bottles. Haut Bages Liberal, they said, would be best between 5 and 20 years, which seemed more reasonable – and pretty much confirmed that the two numbers represented Decanter's notion of a maturity plateau.

Then I considered that the Lafite data might be a misprint. But they claim that Malescot should be consumed between 2 and 5 years; so, by association, it probably wasn’t a misprint.

I’m always being mystified by stuff I read in the wine magazines. The information often seems crazy, like it is provided by high school kids on a special project, or something. I know that’s not true. Does anybody know what is going on with regard to these drinking ranges? What they mean? Decanter can’t be saying you should drink 1998 Lafite between 2008 and 2011, can they?

I just looked up Parker’s opinion. He says 7 to 35 years. That seems reasonable; although I wouldn’t be surprised if the back end could be stretched out a bit.
User avatar

Ian Sutton


Spanna in the works




Sun Apr 09, 2006 3:10 pm


Norwich, UK

Re: Decanter's maturity ranges - they seem crazy

by Ian Sutton » Wed Nov 15, 2006 7:52 pm

Decanters ranges are utterly unreliable and best ignored from what I've seen over the years

I looked up Broadbent, but alas he felt it too young to say either score or maturity, but he seemed to think it was ok. Other 1st growths were listed in the region of 12-25 years.

Time to wait for further opinions IMO

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 4 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign