Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
David M. Bueker
Riesling Guru
34281
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Rahsaan wrote:As a nitpicker I tend not to think of the Jura and the Savoie together because they don't share any grapes and the grapes do not seem to have much in common (Mondeuse is not to Poulsard what Gamay is to Pinot Noir, in my experience).
BUT, they are both Alpine regions and if it's all about extended participating, that could be a good idea. And what about embracing the broader region and doing an Alpine Wine Focus. That might not matter to the extent that Switzerland comes into play because no one even has the wines (except for a very few Euro contributors) but then again Trentino might drift too far.
So Jura and Savoie could be a good middle ground.
David M. Bueker
Riesling Guru
34281
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
David M. Bueker
Riesling Guru
34281
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
David Lole wrote:Should we have a metres/feet above sea level clause in the equation to define Alpine?
JC (NC)
Lifelong Learner
6679
Mon Mar 27, 2006 12:23 pm
Fayetteville, NC
David M. Bueker wrote:I don't recall an "all things Pinot" wine focus, but it indeed does seem rather diverse instead of focused.
Pinot Noir
Pinot Blanc
Pinot Gris
Pinot Meunier
etc.
etc.
etc.
Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, ClaudeBot, Google [Bot] and 2 guests