The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

UPS corporate and franchisee

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Mark S

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1174

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:28 pm

Location

CNY

UPS corporate and franchisee

by Mark S » Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:50 am

Interesting current in the debate over booze shipping.
Perhaps this is why SOME shipments go missing and others aren't?

Franchisees Say UPS Special Policy Forces Them to Handle Alcoholic Beverages
3:00p ET March 11, 2007 (PR NewsWire)
Franchisees of United Parcel Services (NYSE: UPS) today charged that UPS policies force them to take part in the distribution of alcoholic beverages, despite potential harm to underage customers or local restrictions against such shipments.

"As small business owners, we are very concerned about UPS' special service for its selected customers, known as Corporate Retail Solution (CRS)," said Joseph Wightman, an official in the Platinum Shield Association (PSA), an organization of current and former Mailboxes, Etc. (MBE) franchisees across the country. "CRS requires that we handle alcohol -- specifically wine, despite the risk that an underage customer may be assigned to pick up the shipment. I am also concerned that many of our employees are under 21 years of age and may inadvertently be breaking the law," he added.

"It troubles me and many of my associates that we have no say in providing the service," Wightman said, "no matter what we think or -- in some cases -- what local regulations might say about such a practice. Further, UPS is putting its franchisees at grave moral and financial liability in the event an underage recipient drinks the wine and causes a tragic auto accident."

Wightman, whose MBE store is in Manhattan, said the CRS policy covering alcohol was discovered recently, at the same time one of his PSA colleagues found that UPS has a similar policy requiring franchisees to handle shipments from Zero Tolerance Entertainment, a producer of pornographic videos. "You have to wonder," Wightman added, "how UPS could do business with a company whose slogan is 'Zero Tolerance For Bad Pornography' and then claim that the company is in the apparel business."

Wightman identified the alcoholic beverage shipper as Cakebread Cellars, a California-based winegrower and bottler. "We have no complaint with Cakebread Cellars itself," Wightman added; "our issue is with UPS, which seems to be developing a pattern of imposing possibly improper business relationships on franchisees who have moral objections or may operate in locations where these special services are illegal."

In January, PSA revealed that UPS has instructed its franchisees to use their stores as alternate delivery locations for Zero Tolerance Entertainment. "It puts us as franchisees in a difficult position," Wightman said, "and our message to UPS is that we pride ourselves on being productive members of our home communities and hope UPS will honor that attitude in future dealings."

PSA, whose members operate UPS/MBE franchises from California to New York, is presently involved in a lawsuit with UPS over alleged violations of franchise agreements since UPS' acquisition of MBE in 2001. Last year, PSA members attended the UPS annual shareholder meeting in Wilmington, Del. to alert UPS shareholders of the lawsuit and the allegations.

SOURCE Platinum Shield Association

Joann Killeen, or Mike Furtney, both of the Killeen Furtney Group, +1-310-476-6941; Joe Wightman, Platinum Shield Assn., +1-917-880-9609
http://www.prnewswire.com
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21623

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: UPS corporate and franchisee

by Robin Garr » Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:12 am

Maybe I'm just cynical, but I see the occult hand of the wholesale lobby at work here. This guy is parroting their line about the horrors of interstate wine shipping and OH GOD WHO WILL PROTECT THE CHILDREN!!? [wail!]

Note the source, also: This is not news coverage but an unedited public-relations statement on PRNewsWire.
no avatar
User

Mark S

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1174

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:28 pm

Location

CNY

Re: UPS corporate and franchisee

by Mark S » Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:44 am

Robin -

was this ok to post in it's entirety here? Didn't really have a link, so just posted the whole enchilada. I found it funny that a COMMON CARRIER (meaning they are supposed to carry freely) franchisee would object to stuff that they are required to ship. Now what if this was applied to religions? "Sorry, can't ship yamulkes." or "That bookstore is a owned by a pinko-commie-democrat. Can't ship that." And yes: we have Children to protect, in a land where I'm sure more kids die through guns than from wine shipped through a store to a wine aficionado.
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21623

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: UPS corporate and franchisee

by Robin Garr » Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:55 am

Mark S wrote:was this ok to post in it's entirety here? Didn't really have a link, so just posted the whole enchilada.


Mark, absolutely, because it's a PR release, meaning that the producer WANTS it widely disseminated.

Stuff from newspapers and magazines is more problematical because I don't really like to encourage copyright abuse. What I like to do best is post a short snippet, usually the first couple of paragraphs, which falls under "fair use," then link to the rest. When a link isn't available, then a paraphrase is the most honest way to go with copyright material, but I don't really go to the extent of deleting or banning paste-ins.

As I said, though, material from press releases is a special case, because while it's certainly copyright, the author intends it to be distributed and has really failed in his job as a PR flack if that doesn't happen. :)
no avatar
User

Bob Ross

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

5703

Joined

Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:39 pm

Location

Franklin Lakes, NJ

Re: UPS corporate and franchisee

by Bob Ross » Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:05 pm

Cynicism is often rewarded, Robin. The purpose of the United Platinum Shield Trade Association is primarily to fund the class action against UPS. Mission Statement here.

The group is trying to gain public attention: "It has been said before, and it bears repeating. The only way to get the attention of UPS is to shine the spotlight of truth on them in a court of law and the court of public opinion. They have demonstrated from day one that they hate full disclosure, transparency and accountability. Gold Shield was solely for the benefit of UPS profitability and to strike a serious blow at Fed Ex and DHL ground services. They forced franchisee to subsidize their fight to retain and expand market share."

They must believe that banging away at pornography and booze will help them in the court of public opinion.

One thing wine lovers can do is let the local package/shipping stores know that they will hurt their cause among wine lovers.
no avatar
User

Cynthia Wenslow

Rank

Pizza Princess

Posts

5746

Joined

Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:32 pm

Location

The Third Coast

Re: UPS corporate and franchisee

by Cynthia Wenslow » Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:08 pm

Bob Ross wrote:They must believe that banging away at pornography


Ok, did anyone else giggle at that phrase? Be honest! :D
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Riesling Guru

Posts

34367

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: UPS corporate and franchisee

by David M. Bueker » Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:10 pm

Yes.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Bob Ross

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

5703

Joined

Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:39 pm

Location

Franklin Lakes, NJ

Re: UPS corporate and franchisee

by Bob Ross » Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:20 pm

"Ok, did anyone else giggle at that phrase?"

Shock here. :shock:

What could I have been thinking?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot, DotBot, Google [Bot], SemrushBot and 1 guest

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign