Keith M
Beer Explorer
1184
Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:25 am
Finger Lakes, New York
Keith M wrote:Blasphemy!
Robin Garr wrote:Keith M wrote:Blasphemy!
And damned tasty blasphemy at that!
Otto Nieminen wrote:That's not in the script, Robin!
Robin Garr wrote:I prefer originality to derivative prose ... <snif>
Otto Nieminen wrote: a magnum would have been welcome. Lovely, but utterly unexpected.
Jason Hagen wrote:Thanks for the note. When I bought my 04 Fevres, my plan was to wait on most of them. I am going to dig one of these out real soon.Otto Nieminen wrote: a magnum would have been welcome. Lovely, but utterly unexpected.
I have 1 of them too. Maybe I'll let that one go for many years.
Jason
Otto Nieminen wrote:Robin Garr wrote:Keith M wrote:Blasphemy!
And damned tasty blasphemy at that!
That's not in the script, Robin!
Are there any women here?
-O
Sue Courtney wrote:
No women here. If there were, I know one that would probably say that WIlliam Chevre Grand Cru Les Clos 2002 was one of her favourite Chablis's ever.
No idea what POX means. Sounds like a disease. Please explain in the context.
Nigel Groundwater wrote: Chevre=Fevre? and Pox= P(remature) Ox(idation); a phenomenon not yet completely understood but apparently becoming prevalent across the board with vintages from the mid 90s - with 1996 receiving most of the votes.
Users browsing this forum: SemrushBot and 1 guest