by Jenise » Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:51 pm
Jim, I wasn't sure, I just don't follow the California vintages like I used to. And I don't know how to interpret the accolades--I prefer vintages like 91 and 95 to vintages like 94 and 97. '03 is sounding, from the KL mailer anyway, a lot like 97.
Oh, and the poopheads cut back my allocation.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov