The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.
no avatar
User

John Treder

Rank

Zinaholic

Posts

1760

Joined

Thu Jun 29, 2006 11:03 pm

Location

Santa Rosa, CA

The good, and the bad and ugly

by John Treder » Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:39 am

The good: Calif., Sonoma Valley, Wellington “The Duchess” 2011, a blend of Marsanne, Roussanne and Chardonnay. 13.6% alcohol, $9.95 at the winery.
A very pleasant blend, and one heck of a QPR. I enjoyed it over three meals, and then used some dregs for cooking. If you like Marsanne/Roussane, you'll like it, but I know that not all people are enlightened to the more interesting Rhone whites. :-)
I only bought one bottle, enamored at the tasting room. It was much better in the more relaxed setting at home, and I regret that my overcrowded cellar was weighing on my thoughts.
Next time I go back, I'll see what they have.
The badly ugly and just plain bad: Calif., Russian River Valley, De Loach "O. F. S." Pinot Noir 2006. 14.5% alcohol, $38.00 at the winery.
This was early in the resurrection of the De Loach name and tasting room after Cecil went belly-up. I didn't much like the wines when I went there in August 2008 to see what was going on, but somehow I ended up buying two bottles.
The first bottle, just before Christmas 2009, I noted: Surprisingly weak flavor. Nice clear ruby color, but washed out by a veal chop! Better but not overwhelming after the meal. Overall, disappointing.
Having made that note, the other bottle lingered on my "ignore" list, but finally, last night, I opened it. Again with a veal chop, this time covered with fresh chanterelles in a Madeira cream sauce. The veal and sauce and everything else were fine. This bottle caused the meal to descend from very, very enjoyable to just Ok. Nice dark strawberry/light cherry color, reasonable aroma, but sweet soup in the mouth. Horrible stuff. I tasted it again this afternoon and poured the rest out. I haven't found a bottle that bad in years.
John in the wine county
User avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Riesling Guru

Posts

24928

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:52 pm

Location

Connecticut

Re: The good, and the bad and ugly

by David M. Bueker » Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:40 am

It's so sad what happened to DeLoach.
Talk less, smile more. Don't let them know what you're against or what you're for.
User avatar
User

Mark Lipton

Rank

Oenochemist

Posts

4363

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:18 pm

Location

Indiana

Re: The good, and the bad and ugly

by Mark Lipton » Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:37 pm

David M. Bueker wrote:It's so sad what happened to DeLoach.


To the label perhaps, but Cecil DeLoach is doing just fine (I think) at Hook&Ladder, his new winery. Haven't tried the wines, though. I had some great Zinfandels from DeLoach way back in the day.

Mark Lipton
no avatar
User

John Treder

Rank

Zinaholic

Posts

1760

Joined

Thu Jun 29, 2006 11:03 pm

Location

Santa Rosa, CA

Re: The good, and the bad and ugly

by John Treder » Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:14 pm

I've had some Hook & Ladder wines. Cecil has an old fire truck in front of the winery. The Zins are typically DeLoach, and they have a pretty good red blend.
The "new" DeLoach claims to be organic and biodynamic; I think they let that interfere with the winemaking.
John in the wine county

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign