Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
RANDY S MITCHELL wrote:FOR YEARS I'VE DISCREETLY PUT THE RECORKED BOTTLE INTO MY PANTS POCKET - NO MUSS NO FUSS.
WHEN THE OCCASION CALLED FOR A FINE WINE, THE EMPTY BOTTLE ALWAYS IS TAKEN HOME.
Ian Sutton wrote:Greater awareness of risks of drunk driving makes taking remnants home very sensible at a social level. It's perfectly allowable in UK.
Bob Ross wrote:The New Jersey law is permissive, but the restaurant owner has the final say.
One cocktail party bit of legal advice: don't carry the wine home in the main cabin of your car or truck.
Bob Ross wrote:It doesn't have to be that way Robin, it's just human nature to react to people based on first impressions, especially if other people are hurt or killed in the same accident.
Robin Garr wrote:Bob Ross wrote:The New Jersey law is permissive, but the restaurant owner has the final say.
That raises a very interesting point, Bob. I wonder if the laws in the various states require or merely permit restaurateurs to allow the practice, and if this is consistently or inconsistently applied. In other words, as a diner in a take-out state is denied permission to take the bottle as a matter of restaurant policy, what is his standing to object?
Known for his fashionable hair
8148
Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:43 pm
Sacramento, CA
RANDY S MITCHELL wrote:FOR YEARS I'VE DISCREETLY PUT THE RECORKED BOTTLE INTO MY PANTS POCKET - NO MUSS NO FUSS.
WHEN THE OCCASION CALLED FOR A FINE WINE, THE EMPTY BOTTLE ALWAYS IS TAKEN HOME.
Robin Garr wrote: you blokes had the good fortune to claim the convicts as ancestors; we had to take the Puritans ...
Bob Ross wrote:Why did the convicts prevail in Australia, and not in the States and Canada?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests