Everything about food, from matching food and wine to recipes, techniques and trends.
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

26724

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

My new Polder instant-read thermometer

by Jenise » Sat Oct 26, 2013 2:59 pm

So last week I bought a new thermometer, my last no-name cheapie having broken recently. And I bought a Polder--these people are experts in things temperature, and maybe if I had bought a Polder ten years ago I wouldn't have gone through three thermometers in ten years.

Went my thinking. And maybe in ten years it will still be working like a champ. But this one isn't just a thermometer (which I didn't even realize when I bought it, I was in a big hurry the day I selected it and my thinking was simply "instant read-Polder-15 bucks=okay"), it has a special feature. And that special feature is a second button called 'MEAT' that when you press it, causes the various meat types to scroll through the digital screen. Once you select, say, beef, you can select your preferred doneness, and it then tells you what the target temperature is for that doneness and sets a little alarm. The idea is that when you test the meat after some cooking, if the target doneness has been reached you get an audible beeping. That would be super helpful to someone who doesn't have all that stuff in their head (which I do).

The only problem is: it is programmed to believe that rare beef is 140 F. There is no lower setting, and you cannot re-program it.

What in the H-word are they thinking? Even someone who prefers their meat cremated wouldn't find 140 rare, especially since carry-over cooking assures that the actual doneness when sliced and served will be another stage beyond that.

I should return it. I probably won't because it should reliably do what I bought it for and returning is a lot of trouble, but how stupid of them.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

Karen/NoCA

Rank

Hunter/Gatherer

Posts

5264

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:55 pm

Re: My new Polder instant-read thermometer

by Karen/NoCA » Sat Oct 26, 2013 8:58 pm

Jenise wrote:So last week I bought a new thermometer, my last no-name cheapie having broken recently. And I bought a Polder--these people are experts in things temperature, and maybe if I had bought a Polder ten years ago I wouldn't have gone through three thermometers in ten years.

Went my thinking. And maybe in ten years it will still be working like a champ. But this one isn't just a thermometer (which I didn't even realize when I bought it, I was in a big hurry the day I selected it and my thinking was simply "instant read-Polder-15 bucks=okay"), it has a special feature. And that special feature is a second button called 'MEAT' that when you press it, causes the various meat types to scroll through the digital screen. Once you select, say, beef, you can select your preferred doneness, and it then tells you what the target temperature is for that doneness and sets a little alarm. The idea is that when you test the meat after some cooking, if the target doneness has been reached you get an audible beeping. That would be super helpful to someone who doesn't have all that stuff in their head (which I do).

The only problem is: it is programmed to believe that rare beef is 140 F. There is no lower setting, and you cannot re-program it.

What in the H-word are they thinking? Even someone who prefers their meat cremated wouldn't find 140 rare, especially since carry-over cooking assures that the actual doneness when sliced and served will be another stage beyond that.

I should return it. I probably won't because it should reliably do what I bought it for and returning is a lot of trouble, but how stupid of them.


Not stupid...they are thinking "safety" They believe that meat should be cooked to a certain temp. I have used Polder for years, and we have learned to take the reading and reduce it by 10 degrees. Also, they are not allowing for the meat to rest, where the cooking continues.
User avatar
User

Mike Filigenzi

Rank

Known for his fashionable hair

Posts

7095

Joined

Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:43 pm

Location

Sacramento, CA

Re: My new Polder instant-read thermometer

by Mike Filigenzi » Sun Oct 27, 2013 7:08 pm

I bought a Polder a few years back and the darn thing broke relatively early in its life. Since then, we've picked up a Thermapen. Not nearly as nifty as the Polder offerings and quite pricey, but instant and accurate.
"People who love to eat are always the best people"

- Julia Child
User avatar
User

Jon Peterson

Rank

The Court Winer

Posts

2982

Joined

Sat Apr 08, 2006 6:53 pm

Location

The Blue Crab State

Re: My new Polder instant-read thermometer

by Jon Peterson » Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:27 am

Karen/NoCA wrote:
Jenise wrote:The only problem is: it is programmed to believe that rare beef is 140 F.


Not stupid...they are thinking "safety"


I would guess that the minimum temp was recommended by the manufacturers attorneys.
I just wanted to inform you that I find you to be very attractive. Thank you and have a nice day.
User avatar
User

wnissen

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

812

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:16 pm

Location

Livermore, CA

Re: My new Polder instant-read thermometer

by wnissen » Mon Oct 28, 2013 2:29 pm

Jon Peterson wrote:
Karen/NoCA wrote:
Jenise wrote:The only problem is: it is programmed to believe that rare beef is 140 F.


Not stupid...they are thinking "safety"


I would guess that the minimum temp was recommended by the manufacturers attorneys.

Actually, it's the USDA. I recently brought a probe that listed both the USDA fantasy temperatures as well as the temperatures used by "professional" kitchens. The latter were actually accurate.
Walter Nissen
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

26724

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: My new Polder instant-read thermometer

by Jenise » Mon Oct 28, 2013 4:03 pm

Karen/NoCA wrote:Not stupid...they are thinking "safety" They believe that meat should be cooked to a certain temp. I have used Polder for years, and we have learned to take the reading and reduce it by 10 degrees. Also, they are not allowing for the meat to rest, where the cooking continues.


If they were using the USDA reccomendations, I would agree with you (and Jon). But they're not. Where professional kitchens recognize and agree that 115-130 is the range for rare (cool rare at one end and warm rare at the other), the USDA recommendation for beef starts at 145 for medium and goes up from there. They don't reccomend rare at all. It strikes me as ludicrous for Polder to in effect make up their own scale and call 140 "rare". Even if it's "safe", it's still medium.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign