Even among the more staid, bourgeois wine drinkers among us

A recent trend is to knock Beaujolais.
Indeed, the press has not been kind to the appellation and sales have suffered.
Saying you like Beaujolais these days is like admitting to having seduced the babysitter.
However, let me speak up in defense of Beaujolais on 2 counts:
- Beaujolais Nouveau is simply *fun*. It's cheap and cheerful, and is one of the minor events on the calendar I look forward too. To a certain extent, quality is not the paramount attraction at this price point. It's the ritual of the thing. Many of the labels look good, and some of the better known shippers/producers put out a very honest product.
So, color me a hopeless romantic, or fool, or babysitter seducer, but I always buy Beaujolais Nouveau at least once in November - not expecting a Clos de Vougeot, but a fun, fruity, little wine.
- Of course, there is Beaujolais and Beaujolais. And I, too, have had the pale, watered-down, hollow, and disappointing stuff. But, let's face it, there are some very good examples of Beaujolais as well, and not just among the ten "crus".
When I think of a good "anytime" wine to have with dinner, I often pull out a bottle of Beaujolais. And this appellation has often been a friend to me in the bistros of Paris.
Bad wine deserves scorn, for sure. But, please, let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Let us take Beaujolais Nouveau for what it is (and what it costs), and have a nuanced judgement of the appellation as a whole.
Best regards,
Alex R.