Daniel Rogov wrote:Ryan, Hi......
A few words of advice from "an older friend". Let's say you put these back on the market. In an odd way what you are doing is taking something that you regret as probably a bad purchase and trying to pawn it off on someone else. Not the most moral of behaviors.
Hello Rogov,
Arguing for a moment the principle rather than the specific case, whether it is "moral" or not depends on how one presents it. And $30 is more to me than it sounds. $42 after shipping, actually.
OTOH, I have had various old bottles that I felt were dramatically better than your notes suggested. Furthermore, it seems the British, including Broadbent, consider '82 not to have been a bad vintage in the Rhone (and Broadbent always splits his ratings if the two districts differ). Oh, I'm very curious (you should know me and my necro-oenophile ways by now), and tempted. But, I keep thinking, as long as I don't open them, I will not be faced with just how bad an investment they were . . . .
Best Wishes,
Ryan
"The sun, with all those planets revolving about it and dependent on it, can still ripen a bunch of grapes as if it had nothing else to do"
Galileo Galilei
(avatar: me next to the WIYN 3.5 meter telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory)