by Paul Winalski » Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:14 pm
The usual suspects for this sort of thing are:
Top red Bordeaux, in a good vintage. Emphasis on in a good vintage. Classified-growth Bordeaux many years ago got overpriced and well off my radar screen, so I have ignored it entirely since 1990 (the last good vintage until the way-overpriced 2000s). I have no idea if 2006 is an ageworthy vintage. If so, it's worth considering, if you can pay the pound-of-flesh prices they charge these days.
Sauternes, in a good vintage. I'm still enjoying my 1986s from Rieussec, La Tour Blanche, and Suideraut. I'd be enjoying the 1983s still, except I couldn't keep my hands off them, and they're gone. D'Yquem of course would be an excellent candidate, except the prices are up there beyond the stratosphere with the 1st Growth red Bordeaux.
Vintage Port. A house bottling or single-quinta vintage Port from one of the major houses (Taylor-Fladgate, Graham's, Dow, etc.) will easily last 21 years. In fact, they practically DEMAND 21 years or more of ageing to learn some manners. This is THE classic "lay some down for the children when the come of age" wine choice. It's early to know if 2006 will be declared as a Port vintage by any of the houses.
German Auslesen, Beerenauslesen, Trockenbeerenauslesen from major producers in the Mosel-Saar-Ruwer or Rheingau. These are sweet dessert wines that, in good vintages and from good producers, will last for decades.
Vintage Madeira. This stuff is practically immortal. I have drunk 1865 Madeira that tasted downright young. Forget 2006. See if there's something from 1956, or 1906, or, heck, 1806. Or 1966/1967 (would be 50-ish when your child's 21).
Hermitage. Very ageworthy, in good vintages. Unfortunately the prices are right up there with 1er Cru Bordeaux.
Barolo. I've heard it said that nobody's ever tasted over-the-hill Barolo, because they die of old age first. I have some 1982s that are still doing very well, thank you. Prices for recent vintages are, alas, stratospheric.
Select Grand Cru Burgundy. I've had a few ethereal bottles from 1947 and 1949 from great vineyards and great producers. Selection is the big problem. Prices over the past few years have gone through the roof. There's nothing to compare with it if you can encounter the right bottle, but I personally wouldn't take the gamble.
Certain American cabernet sauvignons. Chateau Montelena is the one I have personal acquaintance with. It is very consistent year in and year out. With prices for Bordeaux, Hermitage, and Barolo in the $100s, Montelena is almost a bargain. If you can find it. There are other California wines (and I'm not talking about the over-the-top Parker fruit bombs here) that will last and improve over 20 years. Montelena is the one I am familiar with and sure of (having cellared every vintage since 1980).
Gran Reserva Rioja from a good producer and year certainly has the longevity. I can't speak for the prices.
A lot of the traditional choices, alas, have seen their prices shoot up recently to the point where they're beyond the comfortable reach of all but the very rich. If you're going to lay down something for an offspring, I'd suggest at least 3 bottles, preferably 6 or a 12-bottle case, of the wine of choice. If you can afford the prices being asked for 1er cru Bordeaux, 1er cru Burgundy, Hermitage, or Barolo these days, I salute you--you're way above my own income bracket. Grand Cru Sauternes (except for D'Yquem) is a tad more affordable. Ditto Vintage Port. Relative to the competition, Chateau Montelena is a relative bargain.
This would have been much easier 20 years ago (1986 had an embarrassment of riches, at what are today bargain prices).
Salut,
-Paul W.