by David from Switzerland » Wed Oct 10, 2007 6:09 pm
In terms of "soul" alone, Egon Müller's wines can probably not be beaten. It sometimes strikes me as sickening that what really are "only" down-to-earth natural-tasting wines have to be so expensive, and why not everyone manages to make wines like that, but there are others. We (my friends and me) used to hold Joh. Jos. Prüm and Fritz Haag (and others) in similarly high regard as far as the combination of intellectualism every bacchanalian quality you can think of is concerned, but one seems to have to concentrate on ones far up the ladder (expensive ones) to get what one used to get on every level (qualitatively, not in terms of residual sweetness) twenty years or so ago.
Other producers will make a wine that "offers everything" as I usually call that once in a while, certainly top producers such as Robert Weil achieve that on a rather regular basis, but to some, intellectuality is directly connected to a somewhat drier if not even unbotrytised style, where nothing gets between the taster and the wine's minerality. To me of course, that alone would not yet qualify as wine having or exhibiting "soul". That term I'd only attribute to wines whose personality grabs your attention and won't let go (i.e. you won't forget either). It's what's at the other end of the spectrum from superficiality.
Most top producers manage to make a wine like that once in a while, although some favour winemaking styles that seem to make it impossible to happen unless by mistake (Keller, Selbach, Molitor etc. - producer whom no one would think of as "lesser" ones, but whose wines won't speak to one as a truly fascinating piece of art). None of them manages to make wines that will rock your world in that sense exclusively - but it's probably true that Egon Müller's, in their apparent, down-to-earth natural simplicity achieve this more often than anyone else's. They're like Romanée-Conti wines in this regard.
If there is any justification at all that such wines are so ridiculously expensive (apart from availability, a plethora of wealthy Asian collectors etc.), I couldn't think of another, but then I'm afraid, qualities such as subtlety and finesse, which seem to be what the road to "intellectuality" and "soul" is paved with, are lost on most modern tasters anyhow.
David Buekers suggestion to try some Reinhold Haart and Willi Schaefer seems to me as good a starting point as any, although Haart has rarely made a wine anymore in recent vintages that speaks to the soul on that quasi-transcendental level. The same applies to Dönnhoff, Grünhaus (von Schubert), Fritz Haag, Prüm, Weil, Zilliken (Forstmeister Geltz) - they're all potential sources for such wines, you've merely got to get lucky (or read posts by people who mind what to the quantity-obsessed majority, sadly, appears to be no more than a detail).
Makes me sad to think, by the way, that some sources for such wines, Schloss Vollrads, Schloss Johannisberg, Wwe. Dr. H. Thanisch, Christoffel etc. seem to have dried up compared to when many years ago, they still offered such wines on a yearly basis. Oh well...
Greetings from Switzerland, David.
_________________
„J'ai gâché vingt ans de mes plus belles années au billard. Si c'était à refaire, je recommencerais.“ – Roger Conti