The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.
Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
-

- User
MattThr
- Rank
Ultra geek
- Posts
172
- Joined
Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:25 am
- Location
UK
by MattThr » Mon Nov 05, 2007 5:55 am
Aroma subdued, but evocative of rich, sweet melon with a hint of perfume.
The wine has a creamy texture which makes a surprisingly pleasant complement to the usual sharp acidity of Brut champagne. On the palate it lacks the usual distinctive biscuit flavours but compensates with good fruit - apple, pear and melon all jostling for position on the tongue and outlasting the acidity into a medium length finish.
-

- User
David Creighton
- Rank
Wine guru
- Posts
1217
- Joined
Wed May 24, 2006 10:07 am
- Location
ann arbor, michigan
by David Creighton » Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:34 am
ummmm - doesn't champagne need to be on the lees at least 18 months for NV and longer for vintage? how can there be a 2006 now?
david creighton
-

- User
MattThr
- Rank
Ultra geek
- Posts
172
- Joined
Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:25 am
- Location
UK
by MattThr » Mon Nov 05, 2007 1:03 pm
creightond wrote:ummmm - doesn't champagne need to be on the lees at least 18 months for NV and longer for vintage? how can there be a 2006 now?
Hmm. Fair point. I couldn't see the vintage printed anywhere on the bottle, so I just stupidly assumed it was 2006. I presume it was from the last vintage of Brut that Thienot released but since I don't know how long they mature their bottles for, that's not a lot of help

.
Users browsing this forum: Admantx, AhrefsBot, Amazonbot, APNIC Bot, Bing [Bot], ByteSpider, ClaudeBot, Crawler[var.], Google AgentMatch, Rahsaan and 1 guest