The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: Champagneless NYE- Bdx, 2 reds, 1 sticky

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Dale Williams

Rank

Compassionate Connoisseur

Posts

11158

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:32 pm

Location

Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)

WTN: Champagneless NYE- Bdx, 2 reds, 1 sticky

by Dale Williams » Tue Jan 01, 2008 3:19 pm

We had a quiet NYE, dinner at some nearby (walkable) friends' home. Nice menu- I made some pancetta crisps with cheese, pear, and thyme; the host made thick steaks, mushroom sauce, creamed spinach, baked potatoes, and a sauteed pear dessert. We also enjoyed cheeses, pates, and Scrabble.

We didn't even open the Champagne at midnight, but we did down a few Bordeaux from not-so-acclaimed vintages:

1997 Ch. Margaux (Margaux)
Good dark cassis fruit, a little spice, tobacco. Some floral and berry notes with time. Tannins are fine and resolving. This is a little lacking in concentration and length for a First, but does hold ones interest. I found quite good for the vintage, drinking well now. B+

1979 Domaine de Chevalier (Graves)

Fully matured, resolved tannins. I really liked this, but if you think "Low Acid" is a major superlative, you might not. Bright red plum and raspberry fruit, some tobacco and earth. A little bitter cocoa and earth with time. No hurry on this, but don't think it's getting better. I think I'm only one who preferred to rounder Margaux. B+/A-

1998 Doisy-Vedrines (Barsac)
A major disappointment. Sweet, ok acidity, but lacking in complexity. Seems a bit thin, short. This bottle was opened I think day before, but didn't seem to be oxidized, just dull. C+

Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Riesling Guru

Posts

34380

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN: Champagneless NYE- Bdx, 2 reds, 1 sticky

by David M. Bueker » Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:17 pm

I've had two or three '98 stickies from Sauternes/Barsac &never really been happy.

The Margaux sounds nice & now you've got me second-guessing my red choice from Saturday (though the Burg seemed more of a lunchtime wine & was very enjoyable).
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Dale Williams

Rank

Compassionate Connoisseur

Posts

11158

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:32 pm

Location

Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)

Re: WTN: Champagneless NYE- Bdx, 2 reds, 1 sticky

by Dale Williams » Wed Jan 02, 2008 12:34 pm

'98 doesn't strike me as a great Sauternes vintage, but this still struck me as underachieving.

I appreciated your concern Sat that the Bdx might crash before dinner if we opened for lunch, but it did well for a couple hours (after being double-decanted before we went over- didn't want to jostle on walk). Probably would have put half in a 375. But no use crying over spilt wine! :)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: APNIC Bot, ClaudeBot, SemrushBot and 1 guest

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign