Tonight, I had a nice Argentinian Malbec with grilled, dry-aged, bone-in rib steaks, and something hit me: Malbec, in my humble opinion, is a far superior alternative to everyday Cabernet Sauvignon. Let me be clear: I don't begrudge a GOOD CS--one that is truly balanced and displays that unmistakable impression of craftsmanship and quality--however, so many Cabs that I've tried in the $10-20 range don't impress me. They sear my senses and leave me smacking my lips to get rid of the overt oak flavorings. I've tried and tried, but in the $10-20 range, I never quite feel like its worth it compared to so many other styles available at that price. But this Malbec, for $11, was perfect. It reminded me very much of what I like in a better-quality Cabernet: great mouthfeel (that silky, full-bodied viscosity); great balance of earth, spice, and fruit; oak as an element, as opposed to the predominant flavor; and a lingering finish. It struck me that Malbec shares many of the qualities of Cabernet Sauvignon that I enjoy. I'd still choose a top-shelf Cabernet over Malbec, but I'm hard-pressed to think of a cab that can compete with Malbec, QPR-wise, at this price. Whenever I'm in the mood for Cab in the future, yet don't want to spend more than $20, I know to what section I'm heading in my local wine shop.
Tonight was a semi-special occasion, so I decided to cook a great meal and enjoy some wine...but I wasn't willing to spend much on the wine. I just finished my last law school exam today. Ever.

The wine: 2006 Terrazas de los Andes, Malbec (Argentina), 13.5% alc., $10.79.
So, without further ado, my WTN (I'm a WTN virgin, so be kind

On the nose: the wine displayed a pleasing blend of black cherry and currant, with hints of vanilla...and then, (a quality that I've only recently been able to detect), I could perceive anise. The wine was almost earthy, but not quite as intense as one would perceive in an old world style red.
Taste. One thing that I immediately noticed was its softness, which sometimes turns me off to a wine, but it had a silky, heavy mouthfeel--almost chewy--that complemented that softness very well. The fruit was fresh and forward, and it's spiciness didn't overwhelm it. Indeed, they seemed to complement each other very well. Most importantly for my tastes, it had a very balanced oakiness to it. As I mentioned earlier, the oak was but one element, not the predominant flavor.
For $11, I'll buy again.