Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
Dale Williams
Compassionate Connoisseur
11180
Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:32 pm
Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)
David M. Bueker
Riesling Guru
34446
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Peter Tryba wrote:The Terry Theise Portfolio tasting rolls into Boston on Monday. I'll be popping corks and tasting the wines from noon to 4. From your notes and Terry's "warning" about the high quality, I'm really looking forward to it!
Fredrik wrote:My impression is that 2007 is a great vintage. In contrast to 2005 which was for me very good.
Best
Fredrik Svensson, Luxembourg
David M. Bueker
Riesling Guru
34446
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Rahsaan wrote:Fredrik wrote:My impression is that 2007 is a great vintage. In contrast to 2005 which was for me very good.
Best
Fredrik Svensson, Luxembourg
Different styles, no?
Fredrik wrote:Such a different impressions one can have.
The Von schubert wines are for me very flat, volymonius and completely lacking interest.
Fritz Haag is making better 2007 after a quite good 2006 but a string of really bad efforts from them from 2003 to 2005. Still for me along long way from the performance in the 90s.
Karthauserhof has for me been toghether with JJ Prum the best in Mosel the last five years, but made quite disappointing wines 2007. Very good, but not at the level of the last years
All in all 2007 is shaping up for an fantastically interesting year. I think it will be an exceptional year, far better than 2005. Interestingly many top estates made only very good wines, while many less reputable vineyards made the best wine I have tried from them!
My impression is that 2007 is a great vintage. In contrast to 2005 which was for me very good.
Best
Fredrik Svensson, Luxembourg
David M. Bueker
Riesling Guru
34446
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Peter Tryba wrote:David, the Boston show will be "interesting" as we found out just this past week that the CT tasting was canceled, bringing the entire entourage of Germans and Austrians (maybe a Champenois) here.
As the temperature soared locally into the 90's, the sorting of 300+ bottles into the tasting order was done in our walk-in Beer 'Fridge! By luck we're conducting the tasting outside of downtown Boston, hopefully avoiding an extra 5 degrees of heat, but its going to be a scorcher Monday nonetheless.
The Fish wrote:Who made great 2007 then in your eyes?
Fredrik wrote:Generally thou I am more impressed with the 2007s than the 2005s.
Best
Fredrik Svensson. Luxembourg
Michael K wrote:Great report and thanks much for the info!
Getting excited again about the new releases. If the tastings are now, when will the wines start to arrive?
Also if it is a cross between a 1997 and the 2001, which of these two vintage's characteristics show through? I agree with Rahsaan, I would like to better understand what characteristics people like this vintage. I too perfer the 2001's so far but like the 2004 for their focus and the 2005's for the completeness.
Fredrik wrote:2007 seems more balanced. The wines seems to me more complete and harmonic and I have yet to see much of acidity problems.
The Fish wrote:Michael K wrote:Great report and thanks much for the info!
Getting excited again about the new releases. If the tastings are now, when will the wines start to arrive?
Also if it is a cross between a 1997 and the 2001, which of these two vintage's characteristics show through? I agree with Rahsaan, I would like to better understand what characteristics people like this vintage. I too perfer the 2001's so far but like the 2004 for their focus and the 2005's for the completeness.
it has the aromatic compelxity of 1997 and the zesty balance and acidity of 2001. 2004 doesn't have the physiological ripeness of 2001. 2005 is off the mark as it is a much warmer vintage and is really a modern version of 1975 (only that it is much more powerful).
Anders Källberg
Wine guru
805
Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:48 am
Stockholm, Sweden
Anders Källberg wrote:Clemens-Busch
In particular the 2006 "Falkenlay" felt more like a BA/TBA in the nose and the mouth, but was rather dry. Extremely dense and interesting wines, but lacking the stylishness that I found in, for instance, van Volxem's wines. I wouldn't exactly describe Clemens-Busch's wines as balanced.
Anders Källberg
Wine guru
805
Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:48 am
Stockholm, Sweden
Rahsaan wrote:Anders Källberg wrote:Clemens-Busch
In particular the 2006 "Falkenlay" felt more like a BA/TBA in the nose and the mouth, but was rather dry. Extremely dense and interesting wines, but lacking the stylishness that I found in, for instance, van Volxem's wines. I wouldn't exactly describe Clemens-Busch's wines as balanced.
Interesting. I went to a small pre-VDP tasting with Clemens Busch today and I thought his 2006 spätlese trocken *** was excellent, very firm, very refined, and very balanced. The 06 Vom Roten Schiefer was a bit more like what you describe, rich and exotic, but it didn't get too far out of whack for my palate. At 16 and 18GBP I would definitely buy more some of each to compare in more detail, if I ever get around to it.
I must say they were nothing like the 03 Weissenberg spätlese we had the other night, so perhaps there is a lot of stylistic eclecticism going on here. I didn't get a chance to talk to him because of the crowds. Hopefully tomorrow.
Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, ByteSpider, ClaudeBot, DotBot, Rahsaan and 3 guests