The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WSJ on Italy's ancient vines

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Jim Vandegriff

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

157

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 2:33 am

Location

Trinidad, CA

WSJ on Italy's ancient vines

by Jim Vandegriff » Sun Jul 06, 2008 10:40 pm

There is a good article on finding and resurrecting ancient vines in northern Italy here: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1215118 ... 367_topbox. I enjoyed the article and hope you do too. Jim
in Trinidad, CA, by the sea
no avatar
User

David Creighton

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1217

Joined

Wed May 24, 2006 10:07 am

Location

ann arbor, michigan

Re: WSJ on Italy's ancient vines

by David Creighton » Mon Jul 07, 2008 8:37 am

yes, thank you, very interesting.
david creighton
no avatar
User

Dale Williams

Rank

Compassionate Connoisseur

Posts

11871

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:32 pm

Location

Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)

Re: WSJ on Italy's ancient vines

by Dale Williams » Mon Jul 07, 2008 8:45 am

I was a little surprised by "Like many wines from mountainous regions, these have a relatively high alcohol content -- 13% or more -- in part because at high elevation the grapes get more sunlight, boosting the amount of sugar that will be fermented"

I've only had a few Valle d'Aoste wines, mostly rather low in alcohol. My experience with Alpine wines in general has been mostly low-alcohol, due I assume to cooler temps. I realize that sunlight can be more intense at true high altitudes (due to less atmospheric interference) like atop Rockies, Alps, or Himalayas, but I would think grapes wouldn't grow in those situations.
no avatar
User

wrcstl

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

881

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:20 pm

Location

St. Louis

Re: WSJ on Italy's ancient vines

by wrcstl » Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:34 am

Dale Williams wrote:I was a little surprised by "Like many wines from mountainous regions, these have a relatively high alcohol content -- 13% or more -- in part because at high elevation the grapes get more sunlight, boosting the amount of sugar that will be fermented"

I've only had a few Valle d'Aoste wines, mostly rather low in alcohol. My experience with Alpine wines in general has been mostly low-alcohol, due I assume to cooler temps. I realize that sunlight can be more intense at true high altitudes (due to less atmospheric interference) like atop Rockies, Alps, or Himalayas, but I would think grapes wouldn't grow in those situations.


Dale,
I agree, it seems to be counter intuitive. Would also make me not want to buy these wines.
Walt
no avatar
User

Brian Gilp

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1440

Joined

Tue May 23, 2006 5:50 pm

Re: WSJ on Italy's ancient vines

by Brian Gilp » Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:42 am

Dale Williams wrote:I was a little surprised by "Like many wines from mountainous regions, these have a relatively high alcohol content -- 13% or more -- in part because at high elevation the grapes get more sunlight, boosting the amount of sugar that will be fermented"

I've only had a few Valle d'Aoste wines, mostly rather low in alcohol. My experience with Alpine wines in general has been mostly low-alcohol, due I assume to cooler temps. I realize that sunlight can be more intense at true high altitudes (due to less atmospheric interference) like atop Rockies, Alps, or Himalayas, but I would think grapes wouldn't grow in those situations.


I did not read the article but the line you quote seems to run counter to what I thought. I thought that heat was the predominate factor in sugar accumulation and sunlight in phenolic ripeness. This is how I explain 14% alcohol wines that still taste green from hot, short day regions while there are low alcohol wines withouth the green tastes from cooler, long day regions.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazonbot, Apple Bot, Bing [Bot], ClaudeBot, Tim York and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign