The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN /Wine Advisor: Screwcaps turn to pricey wine

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21879

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

WTN /Wine Advisor: Screwcaps turn to pricey wine

by Robin Garr » Mon Jul 21, 2008 12:05 pm

Screwcaps turn to pricey wine

Since we got a stack of good, serious responses to Friday's article about a modest Sauvignon Blanc's staying power under a sturdy metal screwcap, let's take another look at screwcaps from a different perspective today.

As many will recall, less than a decade ago, the metal screwcap was so thoroughly identified with nasty, "rotgut" wines that the conventional wisdom held that wine "geeks" would never accept them for "serious" wines.

Then PlumpJack Winery, a pricey boutique operation in California's Napa Valley announced in June 2000 that it would equip some of its 1997 Reserve Cabernet with metal screw caps - and that the screw-capped bottles would go for $135, or $10 more than the same wine stoppered with a natural cork.

At that time, just eight years ago, the notion of putting an expensive, collectible wine under a screwcap - just like Wild Irish Rose! - was such an offbeat idea that Plumpjack grabbed headlines in the general media. As a tiny producer that would put metal caps on the produce of only about a dozen barrels that year, they would barely move the market. But they certainly brought attention to the issue.

To that point, only a relatively small number of wineries - most of them in Australia and New Zealand - had been experimenting with the metal cap, a sturdy, long-sleeved device that held wine securely, a far cry from the puny caps used on cheap wines and booze.

Sometime soon after 2000 more and more wines started showing up with the sturdy Stelvin screwcaps. (Others went with plastic-type synthetic "corks," a separate story for another day.) I rather doubt that Plumpjack did much to influence the shift, but certainly public attitudes about wine closures began to change as wine lovers tired of an unacceptably high failure rate of "cork taint" in natural cork.

New Zealand and Australia led the charge, particularly with white wines, which seemed to retain particular clarity and freshness under screw cap. Other white-wine producing regions - Germany, Austria and some U.S. producers - soon joined in. And eventually, red wines too, particularly those not destined for long-term storage, started showing up with metal caps.

Until now, though, there's seemingly been a price ceiling. Save for the Plumpjack exception, screwcaps and synthetics seemed to find their market niche mostly among "everyday" wines in the $7 to $15 or even $20 range.

But recently I'm starting to see another small but significant change. As evidence mounts that ageworthy wines may evolve very nicely indeed under a good screwcap (a debatable issue that had supported the last bastion for natural cork in fancy, cellarworthy wine), These closures are appearing on much more expensive wines in the $50-and-up range, wines as suited for cellaring as for early consumption.

It's slow coming - my friends at Brown-Forman tell me, for instance, that the excellent Sonoma-Cutrer Russian River Chardonnay will show up in screwcap with this year's vintage ... but only as an experiment in Texas and Florida at this time. So progress comes slowly, very slowly.

Thus my surprise when I happily ripped open my recent monthly box of goodies from California Wine Club's high-end Connoisseurs' Series recently and found a trendy, $50-plus Oregon Pinot Noir sporting the familiar metal screwcap. I may have missed it, but at least in my observations at local retail, this is the most costly wine I've found under screwcap since the original Plumpjack experiment.

It's a splendid wine, too, particularly for those who prize their Pinot in the big, intense and blockbuster style. It's made by Pali Wine CDompany of California, whose wine maker is the respected Brian Loring, a man known for making Pinot with real muscles. This may seem an odd combination to bring to an Oregon Pinot, a niche more typically prized for a relatively Burgundian elegance. But this one works for me. It's intense, big and alcoholic and complex and balanced, almost like (if you can imagine such a thing) a Burgundy on steroids.

It retails for $51, although Connoisseurs' Series members may place "restock" orders for less, which, as I said, breaks the $50 barrier for screw capped wines. I don't think it will be the last to do so.

Pali Wine Company 2006 "Momtazi Vineyard" Willamette Valley Pinot Noir
($51 retail; $44 per bottle for half or full case orders by Connoisseurs' Series members)

This monthly offering from Connoisseurs' Series is a dark ruby color, showing crimson glints against the light. Good Pinot aromas, red and black cherries and a light, delicate overtone of cola and brown spice. Mouth-filling and ripe, good acidity and firm tannins; nicely balanced, intense, on the big and ripe side by Oregon standards; of course a lot of people will like that. Moreover, when paired with excellent rare beef, the synergy is amazing, the flavors of the wine and the meat merging in a silken flow. Just 225 cases were made. Winery Website: http://www.paliwineco.com/ (July 19, 2008)

FIND THIS WINE ONLINE:
The Pali Wine Company 2006 "Momtazi Vineyard" Willamette Valley Pinot Noir was a recent shipment in California Wine Club's Connoisseurs' Series and is available for additional orders by Connoisseurs' Series members. Call 1-800-777-4443 to join or learn more.

no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

35995

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN /Wine Advisor: Screwcaps turn to pricey wine

by David M. Bueker » Mon Jul 21, 2008 12:17 pm

If you want to really go big time you can try the Chambertin under screwcap from Boisset.

I have liked the Pali wines. The '05s are really starting to come into their own & shed a little baby fat while not showing bare bones (or alcohol).
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Paul Winalski

Rank

Wok Wielder

Posts

9002

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:16 pm

Location

Merrimack, New Hampshire

Re: WTN /Wine Advisor: Screwcaps turn to pricey wine

by Paul Winalski » Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:28 pm

I have nothing but applause for Stelvin-capped bottles. I have lost way too many treasured and long-cellared bottles to cork taint.

Now we need crown caps on Champagne in place of those eyesight-hazard corks. The Champanois age their wine under crown caps--why not ship them to customers that way?

-Paul W.
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21879

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: WTN /Wine Advisor: Screwcaps turn to pricey wine

by Robin Garr » Mon Jul 21, 2008 5:18 pm

Paul Winalski wrote:those eyesight-hazard corks.

Do you have any solid data on the incidence of actual ocular damage attendant to Champagne corks, Paul? I would guess that the numbers are very small.
no avatar
User

Ted Judd

Rank

Cellar rat

Posts

16

Joined

Fri Apr 14, 2006 1:49 pm

Location

Idaho

Re: WTN /Wine Advisor: Screwcaps turn to pricey wine

by Ted Judd » Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:04 pm

Two quick thoughts,
Champagne is aged as a still wine, it is not till the dosage has been added that the pressure builds and the large cork is needed.
I have paid for the very best natural corks and found flaws other than TCA that damage my wines, such as, seams or (veins?) that run vertically through the length of the cork allowing wine to seep out or air to go in.
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

35995

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN /Wine Advisor: Screwcaps turn to pricey wine

by David M. Bueker » Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:30 pm

Ted Judd wrote:Two quick thoughts,
Champagne is aged as a still wine, it is not till the dosage has been added that the pressure builds and the large cork is needed.
I have paid for the very best natural corks and found flaws other than TCA that damage my wines, such as, seams or (veins?) that run vertically through the length of the cork allowing wine to seep out or air to go in.


Ted,

Champagne is not aged as a still wine. It is aged on its lees as a sparkling wine under a crown cap which is subsequently removed and eventually the cork is added (post lees expulsion & dosage or other topping up).

That last part is certainly another reason to get rid of corks (I've had flawed corks in bottles that I opened as well).
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Ted Judd

Rank

Cellar rat

Posts

16

Joined

Fri Apr 14, 2006 1:49 pm

Location

Idaho

Re: WTN /Wine Advisor: Screwcaps turn to pricey wine

by Ted Judd » Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:42 pm

right you are, not a still wine. :-{

Could I have been thinking of the possibility of added pressure if secondary fermentation occurs after dosage?

ted
no avatar
User

Paul Winalski

Rank

Wok Wielder

Posts

9002

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:16 pm

Location

Merrimack, New Hampshire

Re: WTN /Wine Advisor: Screwcaps turn to pricey wine

by Paul Winalski » Mon Jul 21, 2008 8:50 pm

Robin Garr wrote:Do you have any solid data on the incidence of actual ocular damage attendant to Champagne corks, Paul? I would guess that the numbers are very small.


I'm sure you're right, Robin. Just employing that little rhetorical flourish, hyperbole.

But I HAVE had Champagne corks break off while trying to remove them, and it's a PITA at the best of times. And I have also encountered a case of a leaky cork that left the Champagne flat. Crown caps are good enough for the entire aging process--why not for the consumer?

-Paul W.
no avatar
User

Michael Pronay

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

319

Joined

Mon May 01, 2006 12:47 pm

Location

Vienna, Austria

Re: WTN /Wine Advisor: Screwcaps turn to pricey wine

by Michael Pronay » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:23 pm

Robin,

there cannot be scientific data for cork taint incidents. Our Oz friend James Halliday told me that at the AWRI they renamed "randox" (random oxidation) to "sporadic oxidation": With random one should be able to give an overall failure rate (which simply is not possible).

Thus said, our experience with sparklers over here (Austrian, Italian, Cava, Champagne) is the definitely the same as with still wines: 10 to 20 percent.

The worst region: Bordeaux. Once a year we do a "10 Years After" tasting, the large majority of the 80 to 100 samples being provided by the châteaux. For the last six years I do cork statistics: We encounter a 20 to 40(!) percent taint rate immediately confirmed by a back-up bottle sharing provenance tasted right next to the suspicious bottle.

Why Champagne producers do not use crown caps? Easy answer: regulations insist on bark corks for any bottle larger than 187.5, 200 or 250 ml.
Ceterum censeo corticem esse delendam

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazonbot, ByteSpider, ClaudeBot, Don Rice, FB-extagent and 1 guest

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign