Paul B. wrote:I try to avoid the goopy/high-rs/high-alcohol/confected types from the New World. That said, a well balanced, chalky, dusty and violetty Merlot is still a nice wine. Which brings me to my question:
Paul B. wrote:Sue, Jon beat me to it ... I was just going to say that most of the Californian ones I've had tasted that way.
But yes, New World also includes Virginia (which I have tasted - at Niagara Cool) and Ontario, which does Merlot well in good years and when the vines actually survive all the climatic woes stacked against them.
Brian K Miller
Passionate Arboisphile
9340
Fri Aug 25, 2006 1:05 am
Northern California
Sue Courtney wrote:Aha! 'New World' also includes Chile and New Zealand - both where there are some very stellar merlots being produced.
Mark Lipton wrote:Sue Courtney wrote:Aha! 'New World' also includes Chile and New Zealand - both where there are some very stellar merlots being produced.
Sue, who in your estimation are making steller Merlots in NZ? I'd presume that most if not all are in Hawke's Bay/Waiheke Island, but my experience with the variety there doesn't extend much beyond Te Mata(my top), Esk Valley (also v. good), Matariki and CJ Pask.
Mark Lipton
Carl Eppig
Our Maine man
4149
Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:38 pm
Middleton, NH, USA
Sue Courtney wrote:
Of the 100% Merlot wines, Craggy Range was my favourite producer last year although I have not tasted their current 2006 vintage releases. Two wines in particular - Craggy Range Gimblett Gravels Merlot 2005 and Craggy Range Sophia 2005.
Also Ti Point One Merlot 2005 from Matakana, north of Auckland.
I have a Villa Maria Omahu Gravels Merlot 2006 (Hawkes Bay fruit)here to taste and I imagine this will also be very good.
Not that many 100% merlots here really. Most are merlot dominant blends.
Paul B. wrote:Has any re-thinking or re-strategizing taken place since the Sideways phenomenon that supposedly saw Merlot sales take a dive?
Users browsing this forum: Amazonbot, ClaudeBot and 0 guests