David M. Bueker wrote:Ok so in re-reading this thread I use the terms differently than most of you:
Primary - all that stuff that is there when the wine is first released, including any winemaking inputs (e.g. oak)
Secondary - the beginning of maturation - this is where I pick up petrol/smoke in Riesling, fruit begins to back off, oak integrates in red wine, sugar fades somewhat (again a Riesling thing)
Tertiary - the signs of full maturity (forest floor, clove & dried orange, honey, old leather)
This is what I think of when I see these terms used, but I see that is not what it meant by significant numbers of others. I would add that to me, tertiary is a positive descriptor indicating the development of complexity with maturity, not dried out fruit or other signs of senescence. Though I will admit that some of what I might consider a sign of complexity might be a sign of an OTH wine to someone else.
Ultimately, I agree that being more specific conveys more information than the use of the terms primary, secondary, tertiary. Personally, I stopped using these terms after being laughed at in a tasting by a bunch of wine geeks for using "tertiary." Apparently that was too geeky even for them...