Last night Betsy and a friend headed to Boscobel to watch "Cymbeline." I was left at home with the dog, a steak (sadly for Lucy, I didn't really share), beans, salad, and leftover greens. I opened the 2005 Ch. Saint-Jacques (Pomerol). I temper my expectations due to the M. Touton on label. Good thing I didn't have my hopes up. Wood overlying ripe cherry fruit, but despite the ripeness there's an annoying green streak. Tannins are rough and biting, though overall this has less body than I expect from a 2005 Bordeaux. I decide this ISN'T what I want with my steak, set aside. Revisited 3+ hours later, the tannins have softened a bit, though still tacky, and overall its a bit better. Still, no desire to save, and about 20 oz goes into vinegar crock. C
My switchover steak wine was a half bottle of the 2004 Ch. Cantemerle (Haut-Medoc). A touch of vanilla over some solid cassis fruit, nicely balanced acidity, tannins there but ripe/supple. Some pencil on finish. Much more attractive than the unknown Pomerol, a nice fairly classic claret that could use a little time. B/B+
When Betsy got home, she brought back a couple of ounces from the 375 of 2004 Ch. d'Aiguilhe I had armed her with. Ripe berries and dark plums, noticable toasty oak that isn't too obtrusive, just a hint of ferric minerals. Modern but nice, though I'd give the edge to the Cantemerle. B
(edited for title typo, let's see if it changes thread title or just this post, thanks guys (though I like Wine Yuck and Wine Yelling ideas)Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency.
