The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: Beaulieu and William Harrison

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Brian K Miller

Rank

Passionate Arboisphile

Posts

9340

Joined

Fri Aug 25, 2006 1:05 am

Location

Northern California

WTN: Beaulieu and William Harrison

by Brian K Miller » Mon Sep 22, 2008 11:18 am

On Sunday, after trying a few mediocre (at best) wines in Alexander Valley, I decided to splurge and do a Beaulieu Reserve tasting.

2001 Blanc de Noir. They don't make sparkling wines any more, which is a shame. I really thought this was beautiful, with a hint of yeastiness, some sweet fruit, great flavors. Not a big "Champagne" but it was lovely (better than the Domaine chandon wines I had tried last month! :roll: )

2005 Chardonnay. A rich oaky, 70% Malo style, but very elegant nonetheless. 88 points

2005 Reserve Pinot Noir (Carneros). Wow. This was quite lovely. Very much on the dark fruit side, plum and black cherry, but also very, very earthy and mushroomy, too. What won me over was the beutiful silkiness of the mouth feel. Bravo! 95 points!

2005 Tapestry (Bordeaux Blend). Somewhat green in flavor right now (seems to be common for young 2005 wines), but the tannins were, like the Pinot above, amazingly silky and beautiful in quality. 90 points.

2005 Georges de la Tour. Wow. Just wow. This utterly blows away the 2004. They were featuring this wine because it was the release weekend (on Saturday). Sure, it's too expensive and I can't afford it, but this wine was just stunning. The fruit was beautiful dark cherry and cassis. Not a hint of green pepper, here. Yet, I wouldn't classify this as a "fruit bomb" per se because there were other things that I like going on. Great mouth feel and structure. Some tobacco, some earth, some leather. What will this wine do in ten years? 98 points, which may be my highest point score ever???!!!!

Because we were expressing our appreciation, they also poured for us the 1995 GdlT. Great nose of mature cab, but the palate was not as exciting-a little thin or unexciting. 88 points

However, they then poured the 2002 Tapestry, which was singing quite nicely today. No green elements here, instead dark black cassis fruit, great leather notes. Wonderful wine 92 points. The Clone 337 bottling was much more brambly and still very tannic. I think the Clone 337 will be obviously a better wine, but in 5-10 years. 90 points with strong upside potential.

I know there are those who only drink lean European wines. I like well-made versions of American wines, too. :twisted:

I also stopped at William Harrison. Just tried the new Cab Franc. My palate was shot (long day of bicycling, dehydrated perhaps?) so everything was tasting a little sweet to me. However, the nose to this Rutherford Cab Franc was beautiful-a great savory herbaceousness that bodes well for the wine.

Finally, I tried the 2005 Clos Du Val Reserve (Carneros) Pinot Noir as well. This was utterly different than the Beaulieu. If tasted blind, I might swear this was a lean Loire Valley Hippy Organic Pinot. Light ruby color, bracing acidity, cranberry and red cherry fruit. Great food wine. Six months was the recommended cellaring time before even cracking the bottle.
...(Humans) are unique in our capacity to construct realities at utter odds with reality. Dogs dream and dolphins imagine, but only humans are deluded. –Jacob Bacharach
no avatar
User

JC (NC)

Rank

Lifelong Learner

Posts

6679

Joined

Mon Mar 27, 2006 12:23 pm

Location

Fayetteville, NC

Re: WTN: Beaulieu and William Harrison

by JC (NC) » Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:49 pm

Thanks for the notes. In a tasting of mostly top-tier '94 Cabernet Sauvignon and Meritage blends, the Georges de la Tour was my favorite. I have a Tapestry at home but unfortunately the Georges de la Tour is beyond my budget also.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, APNIC Bot, Babbar, ClaudeBot, Google [Bot] and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign