Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
TomHill wrote:And a wee BloodyPulpit:
1. I was pretty impressed by the structure of this wine. Refoscos from Italy I've had tend to be a bit softer & fleshier, w/ only a bit of a tannic bite. This was more akin to a Savoie Mondeuse (same variety supposedly) on the palate, but less earthiness and much more aromatic fruit. Of course, not as good as the world's greatest Mondeuse...which would be MikeOfficer's.
Tom
Wink Lorch wrote:Refosco has been proven to be not the same as Mondeuse, though older books claim it to be so. Mondeuse is a relative of Syrah (either grandchild or grandparent!) - those of you who are Purple Pagers on Jancis R's site can see articles published last December about this (do a search on Mondeuse) and it will be the lead story in my chapter in the 2009 Wine Report, out very soon.
Having said that I can see why you would connect the two from your description of the wine.
Please could you explain or tell me what is MikeOfficer's Mondeuse??
TomHill wrote:Thanks for correcting my misunderstanding. Is Refosco related to any other grape variety we know??
Wink Lorch wrote:Thanks for the info on the two Calif Mondeuses - I think I heard before on this board about the Carlisle and was surprised because it apparently had around 14% alcohol, whereas it doesn't matter how low the yield is and how hot the summer, Mondeuse in Savoie never attains more than 11% natural alcohol. I suspect the Calif version may not be exactly the same. For the records, there is also a very old strain of Mondeuse (supposedly) grown in Victoria, Australia by Brown Bros - sold as a blended wine with Cabernet and Shiraz.
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 1 guest