The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: 1996 Lynch Moussas

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

44971

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

WTN: 1996 Lynch Moussas

by Jenise » Tue Sep 30, 2008 1:05 pm

1996 Lynch Moussas, Paulliac, Bordeaux
I became interested in the wines of Lynch Moussas after Covert Harris raved about a vintage or two. Frankly, until he mentioned it, this producer had escaped my notice which isn't all that surprising considering I'm on the under-served west coast and it's a very traditional producer pretty much ignored by Parker. For which I give thanks, as I was able to score a trio of 96's at auction for relatively little money about three years ago. This was the last bottle and the best: modest brett upon opening which sloughs off leaving a loamy funk on the restrained cassis and plum fruit with the obligatory paulliac pencil shavings. This bottle was fuller bodied than the other two (the last about 18 months ago) and fully mature with smooth tannins. There's a faint but pleasant merlot-ish powder sugar sweetness in the nose, but on the palate it's more savory than not with notes reminded me of fresh parsnips roasted with herbs de provence. A very solid, masculine, unfrilly style Bordeaux that might hold here awhile but I don't think it's going to improve from this point. Must add that I enjoyed this a lot, though it wouldn't be my favorite Bordeaux by any means.

Must add a note about food pairing: this wine could be a poster child for Wines That Need Food, because when sipped with cold, rare grilled Tri-Tip every flavor more than doubles in size and depth. It made me think about the lamb vs. beef argument for Bordeaux, and wondered who on earth could think there's a better match for this wine than this. I wouldn't have traded!
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

Covert

Rank

NOT David Caruso

Posts

4065

Joined

Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:17 pm

Location

Albany, New York

Re: WTN: 1996 Lynch Moussas

by Covert » Tue Sep 30, 2008 1:27 pm

Jenise, I am so happy for you. The '96 is a rare little treasure - like a perfect three-minute sunset peak over the water, which, if you weren't looking, would never have happened - that gained little following because of mild reviews and its modest price. Agree with all your findings. I have about five bottles of it left.

Did you happen to see the blind tasting report in Decanter (by a panel) which placed the respectively, modestly priced 2005 Lynch Moussas ahead of several - maybe all, or all but one - of the 2005 First Growths? I have 6 bottles coming from Zachy's (only because of the stock market - should be two cases). Maybe you should at least buy a case.
no avatar
User

Dale Williams

Rank

Compassionate Connoisseur

Posts

11871

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:32 pm

Location

Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)

Re: WTN: 1996 Lynch Moussas

by Dale Williams » Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:38 pm

To be fair to Parker, while he doesn't care much for the estate, I'm pretty sure he liked the '96 (because I was still reading WA then, and think that's why I bought a 6pk). I have one left, agree it's probably not improving from here, but a solid little claret.
no avatar
User

Joe Moryl

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

984

Joined

Tue Aug 14, 2007 9:38 pm

Location

New Jersey, USA

Re: WTN: 1996 Lynch Moussas

by Joe Moryl » Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:24 pm

To add to what Dale says, this was one of those estates, that prior to the mid '90s, was often labeled as an 'underperformer'. I was just thinking about this recently when I noticed a bottle of the 2000 selling for $65 and wistfully remarked to the shopkeeper about drinking the last of my '96 purchased for $20. He didn't look pleased, as I must have telegraphed that I wouldn't be buying any at the higher price. But I would agree with Jenise's impression of this wine as being spot on.
no avatar
User

Matt Richman

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

623

Joined

Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:16 pm

Location

Brooklyn, NY

Re: WTN: 1996 Lynch Moussas

by Matt Richman » Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:32 pm

I too have enjoyed this wine. It's the only vintage of Lynch Moussas that I recall tasting, but I did like it very much. I'm a big fan of 1996 left bank.
no avatar
User

Charles Weiss

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

444

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:47 pm

Location

Boston

Re: WTN: 1996 Lynch Moussas

by Charles Weiss » Thu Oct 02, 2008 1:09 pm

Of historical interest only (if that), the 1975 Lynch Moussas was a very pleasant wine with plenty of guts but without the hard tannins that so often outmuscled and outlived the fruit in that vintage.
Charles
Charles Weiss
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

44971

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: WTN: 1996 Lynch Moussas

by Jenise » Fri Oct 03, 2008 5:26 pm

Joe Moryl wrote:To add to what Dale says, this was one of those estates, that prior to the mid '90s, was often labeled as an 'underperformer'. I was just thinking about this recently when I noticed a bottle of the 2000 selling for $65 and wistfully remarked to the shopkeeper about drinking the last of my '96 purchased for $20. He didn't look pleased, as I must have telegraphed that I wouldn't be buying any at the higher price. But I would agree with Jenise's impression of this wine as being spot on.


$65? Yikes--but I guess that's standard vintage markup, right? It's usually only a $30 bottle, IIRC.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

Joe Moryl

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

984

Joined

Tue Aug 14, 2007 9:38 pm

Location

New Jersey, USA

Re: WTN: 1996 Lynch Moussas

by Joe Moryl » Fri Oct 03, 2008 11:48 pm

Jenise wrote:
Joe Moryl wrote:To add to what Dale says, this was one of those estates, that prior to the mid '90s, was often labeled as an 'underperformer'. I was just thinking about this recently when I noticed a bottle of the 2000 selling for $65 and wistfully remarked to the shopkeeper about drinking the last of my '96 purchased for $20. He didn't look pleased, as I must have telegraphed that I wouldn't be buying any at the higher price. But I would agree with Jenise's impression of this wine as being spot on.


$65? Yikes--but I guess that's standard vintage markup, right? It's usually only a $30 bottle, IIRC.


That was at a little neighborhood shop in an upscale town (I was after a bottle of wine to cook with and left with a $10 bottle of Pascal Toso Malbec....not too bad). A bit of online searching shows the 2000 can be had for $35-$50, so I guess the $65 price is a bit extreme.
no avatar
User

David Lole

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1433

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 3:49 am

Location

Canberra, Australia

Re: WTN: 1996 Lynch Moussas

by David Lole » Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:58 am

Jenise,

Any chance your excellent note could also be posted in this month's Wine Focus on Cabernet?

Do you have any idea on the grape percentages used at this Chateau?
Cheers,

David
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

44971

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: WTN: 1996 Lynch Moussas

by Jenise » Sat Oct 04, 2008 12:03 pm

David Lole wrote:Do you have any idea on the grape percentages used at this Chateau?


I'll look it up.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazonbot, Babbar, ClaudeBot, DotBot, Google AgentMatch, SemrushBot and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign