Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
Mike Filigenzi
Known for his fashionable hair
8253
Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:43 pm
Sacramento, CA
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
44971
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Mike Filigenzi
Known for his fashionable hair
8253
Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:43 pm
Sacramento, CA
Lou Kessler wrote:When you learn how few younger people read any part of a newspaper each day, you realize it's just a matter of time that they will cease to exist.
I love the NY times in the morning with a cup of coffee. One of the great things of being retired
Rahsaan wrote:Lou Kessler wrote:When you learn how few younger people read any part of a newspaper each day, you realize it's just a matter of time that they will cease to exist.
Well people do still like to consume news, just in different forms.I love the NY times in the morning with a cup of coffee. One of the great things of being retired
You mean you used to work?
Lou Kessler wrote:I don't have a tendency to read news in depth on the internet. It's just not as comfortable to my mind as reading a newspaper. I suppose I could read books on line but I don't for the same reason.
Actually I've always envied you because you've been able to avoid work at a much younger age then I could manage.![]()
Hoke
Achieving Wine Immortality
11420
Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:07 am
Portland, OR
Even periodicals like the New Yorker are fine for me to read online because every word is not important
Hoke wrote:Ah, but the trick is knowing beforehand which words are important, and which are not important.
Rahsaan wrote:Lou Kessler wrote:I don't have a tendency to read news in depth on the internet. It's just not as comfortable to my mind as reading a newspaper. I suppose I could read books on line but I don't for the same reason.
I agree that it is more comfortable to read paper than online, and I don't read books on the computer either. But most newspapers are far from in depth and whether online or on paper they can more or less be quickly scanned. Even periodicals like the New Yorker are fine for me to read online because every word is not important and it doesn't require as much concentration as a novel, for example. Those I cannot read online.
Of course even this is a generational/style thing as among my acquaintances I am in the minority with such a pro-online stance.Actually I've always envied you because you've been able to avoid work at a much younger age then I could manage.![]()
I knew I could teach you something
Lou Kessler wrote:The New Yorker is a far cry from The New York Times. The print edition.
Rahsaan wrote:Lou Kessler wrote:The New Yorker is a far cry from The New York Times. The print edition.
Not sure of your point here.
The NY Times is much less dense than the New Yorker. Much easier to skim.
Mike Filigenzi
Known for his fashionable hair
8253
Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:43 pm
Sacramento, CA
Bob Henrick
Kamado Kommander
3919
Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:35 pm
Lexington, Ky.
Lou Kessler wrote:When you learn how few younger people read any part of a newspaper each day, you realize it's just a matter of time that they will cease to exist. I love the NY times in the morning with a cup of coffee. One of the great things of being retired.
Bob Henrick wrote:Lou Kessler wrote:When you learn how few younger people read any part of a newspaper each day, you realize it's just a matter of time that they will cease to exist. I love the NY times in the morning with a cup of coffee. One of the great things of being retired.
When did you get old enough to retire Lou? I am shocked, I say, SHOCKED! Hope you and Betty Lu had a great Thanksgiving day.
Users browsing this forum: Apple Bot, Babbar, ByteSpider, ClaudeBot, DotBot, Google [Bot] and 0 guests