Hoke wrote:I'm not insensitive or dismissive of some people's concerns that a screwcap may actually be too good at what it does, and close of the wine from any oxygen ingress, and that aged red wine as we know it now depends on that paradigm to become what we expect it to become. Hence my pointing out to you the new permeability aspect of screw caps.
I would far rather have a screwcap closing my precious bottle, thereby allowing controlled oxygen exposure, instead of a cork, which is at the very best a hit or miss proposition for such a wine. Simply put, the screwcap appears to be the better and more efficient closure for doing what it is supposed to do without egregious flaw, taint or outright failure.
And your subsequent response to Oswaldo's question has elicited just the response I wanted too, so I have no further questions of you at this time. You may leave the inquisition chamber. That's because you science guys inevitably yield to logic. (Or at least like to believe you do.)
Hoke,
that's my question; if, as appears to be the case, screwcaps can be made with variable oxygen transmission built into the cap liner, what would be the remaining objection? Other than the fetish of cork, as Randall Grahm describes it?