Bollinger Special Cuvee NV
I can understand why some people love Bollie, but it has never quite done enough for me. Here's why for this particular wine:
The spritz is like a whitewash of sea waves crashing on rocks (even in clean glassware

A nose of pear edging on quince, some glue stick / paper paste-glue; then browned/oxidised apple with more air, and a slight marzipan/dry biscotti aroma. The nose is nice, but I generally prefer brioche/biscuit/bread to glue; and I tend to enjoy, for example, fresh apple/lemon/florals to bruised apple.
The style is very fresh. This bottle actually has a slightly sharp and hard finish (I would actually call it slightly cutting, though many people would just call it refreshing). I like freshness, but this is a little too fresh for me given what else is there. I like to see more smoothness/cream in the finish too.
Don't get me wrong, this is very good Champagne, it's just that I personally prefer more creamy and biscuity styles, with acidity that doesn't dominate too much. For me, the Bollie SC NV is like an upmarket "function Champagne" where you are chatting with people: you don't pay too much attention to the wine in the glass, and you don't need to!
As far as oak-influenced Champagnes go, I prefer Pol, Roederer and Krug, but I can understand why this has the rep it does. I'd be interested to hear others' thoughts on this.