The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: Mayacamas, Giroud, and a Giscours as bad as its rep

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Dale Williams

Rank

Compassionate Connoisseur

Posts

11876

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:32 pm

Location

Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)

WTN: Mayacamas, Giroud, and a Giscours as bad as its rep

by Dale Williams » Sat May 30, 2009 4:25 pm

It's rare that I would open 2 bottles for just the two of us, much less three, but managed it last night. Betsy had a dress rehearsal but would be home for a late dinner, but I didn't think my dinner wine was best served by being opened early, and I wanted a glass while cooking. So started with a half bottle of 2003 Mayacamas Chardonnay (Mt Veeder, Napa). Nice clean brisk Chardonnay, no butter here, nice base of pear and citrus fruit with just a hint of vanillin oak. Good acidity, fairly big in the mouth, nice wine for my tastes. B+

So dinner was a roast chicken that shared the pan with some potatoes, broccoli, and cauliflower (all accented with thyme and garlic), plus some lseaweed salad leftover from previous night and some sauteed arugula. The planned wine was the 1983 Ch. Giscours (Margaux). OK, I know Giscours had a sucky rep in 80s and 90s, but I've enjoyed '70 and '79, generally love '83 Margaux appellation, saw it for $20, and needed to fill out a shipment. Not expecting a stunner, just hoping for a decent mature claret. Cork came out cleanly with Ah So, only about bottom third soaked, decanted, time to try. Damn. Even with tempered expectations, a disappointment. Tired thin black plum fruit, still some woody tannins, a bit of ashtray. Not so much over the hill as never tried to go up it. I'd had a long day and just didn't feel like suffering through this. Opened another wine, though I admit a taste at end of the night actually showed a bit better than this. Still, at peak the best I could say is C/C+

Replacement wine was a Burgundy (didn't have any more mature Bdx standing up), the 2004 Camille Giroud Bourgogne. No sign of the green meanies here, big for Bourgogne, black cherry fruit, moderate acidity and some tannins that are a little hard, nice enough but comes across as a tad clunky. More about Pinot Noir than Burgundy for my tastes. Still, not bad. We'll see how it does tonight. B

Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency. 
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36002

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN: Mayacamas, Giroud, and a Giscours as bad as its rep

by David M. Bueker » Sat May 30, 2009 5:01 pm

I'm glad Giscours has stepped up as of late. There's no such thing as too much good wine from Margaux.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Dale Williams

Rank

Compassionate Connoisseur

Posts

11876

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:32 pm

Location

Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)

Re: WTN: Mayacamas, Giroud, and a Giscours as bad as its rep

by Dale Williams » Sat May 30, 2009 7:30 pm

David M. Bueker wrote:I'm glad Giscours has stepped up as of late. There's no such thing as too much good wine from Margaux.


I liked the 2001 Giscours. I hope they don't carry things too far (as Lascombes has for my tastes).

So I'm waiting for couple friends to come over for guys night on the patio. I sampled last night's leftovers. I was surprised at how poorly the Chard held up- it's hot and slightly oxidized, about 1/2 of the 1/2 will go down sink. The Giscours is now a straight D-. The Giroud held up ok,

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], ClaudeBot, DotBot, Google AgentMatch and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign