Today I was handed a fishbowl Riedel with a light coloured liquid in it. It was by no means a great wine, but that isn't what one always needs. This seemed like an honest, little wine and it smelled of beetroot and pure Pinosity and it seemingly sees only neutral wood. Deliciously light body, not terribly high acidity, but perfectly adequate; nice tannins, too. Refreshing and quite moreish - it didn't take long to finish my glass. It looked like Pinot and smelled like Pinot so blurted out that it was a very decent Burgundy from some lighter, less exalted terroir, some good recent vintage perhaps '06 because of the strong fruit presence.
My interlocutor laughed and told me to guess again. I said "ok, from the charming tartness added to the nice fruit, it might be one of the more successful Alsace Pinots?"
I was told it was new world. And then I did guess Oregon. The wine was
Firesteed Oregon Pinot Noir 2007 and it is only 12,4% abv. It apparently costs somewhere around 10$ over there, but sadly over 18€ here.

It's not worth it at the Finnish price because I can get some perfectly decent minor Faiveley and Drouhin for less, but at 10$ I think I would buy this on occasion. It seemed like perfectly honest Pinot. And there is always a use for such on my table.
Is this considered a mediocre producer? CellarTracker only had one note on this wine and it was far from positive. But I have always liked bad wine, lol!
I don't drink wine because of religious reasons ... only for other reasons.