wnissen wrote:Dear Hoke,
Is there really textural variation among 40% vokdas? I wasn't aware there was enough of anything beside ethanol and water to make that kind of difference.
Walt
Yes, there actually is, Walt. Not as readily discernible variations as with, let's say, whiskies, but they are there. Just harder to isolate and perceive in most instances.
Vodka---now---comes in two predominant styles, the so-called "original vodka" (meaning the original fed defintion of vodka---tasteless, odorless, colorless), which is intentionally cooked at a high heat to as high a proof as possible to strip away as much flavor as possible. Versus the so-called EU style, which maintains that the intent is to leave identity of the source elements (grains, wines, potato) intact.
As for texture, yes, there is often textural variation you can pick up. Best done by comparing a wide range of vodkas at the same time. Almost impossible to do for most people who sample one vodka at a time though.
What I do in my classes is put down (all blind) something like a Finlandia (made from expensive barley), maybe a mid-range like Grey Goose (mixed grain), an wheat vodka (Absolut), perhaps a Rye vodka (hard grain, can be spicy), and either Hangar One or Ciroc.
Finlandia is obviously (obviously in comparison) a Crisp Style, with a of snap and a very crisp texture. Absolut is made from wheat so it has a very soft profile; it's called a "Creamy style" vodka. Rye tends to be hard and a touch spicy. Hangar One is about 9-10% very aromatic Viognier---and you can still pick up wisps of texture and aroma in the vodka. Ciroc is made from French wine---they say "fine French Wine'', but I suspect that's marketing speak for industrial wine, and it shows traces of origin to (although not as much as Hangar One, in my opinion.)
Again, it is possible---not always, but sometimes---to identify different characteristics in vodka. Hint: serve it at room temperature instead of icy cold.