The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.
User avatar
User

ClarkDGigHbr

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

485

Joined

Sat May 06, 2006 8:16 pm

Location

Gig Harbor, WA

WTN: 2004 Barrister Cabernet Franc

by ClarkDGigHbr » Sat Oct 28, 2006 3:26 am

Our wine tasting group held a Cabernet Franc tasting this past weekend. We followed our normal process of carefully concealing the wines in bags in order to perform a blind tasting. There were eight ( 8 ) voters and five (5) wines.

The point tally revealed that the 2004 Barrister Columbia Valley Cabernet Franc finished in last place. It wasn't even close to the fourth place wine. I was surprised by this result, because I had heard very good things about Barrister Cab Franc. The wine ended up with one 2nd place vote, two 3rd place votes, two 4th place votes and three 5th place votes. Mine was one of the 5th place votes.

Today, a friend sent me an email with a brief review of the Pacific Northwest Wine of the Week, the 2004 Barrister Cabernet Franc. The review ended with the declaration ... Rated "Outstanding" by Wine Press Northwest magazine.

I was shocked. There was no way this wine deserved such a rating. Do any of the WLDG tasters recall tasting this wine? If so, what was your impression?

-- Clark
no avatar
User

Rahsaan

Rank

Wild and Crazy Guy

Posts

7024

Joined

Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:20 pm

Location

Chapel Hill, NC

Re: WTN: 2004 Barrister Cabernet Franc

by Rahsaan » Sat Oct 28, 2006 4:48 am

What were the other wines?

Is this Barrister Business expensive?
User avatar
User

Howie Hart

Rank

The Hart of Buffalo

Posts

5976

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 5:13 pm

Location

Niagara Falls, NY

Re: WTN: 2004 Barrister Cabernet Franc

by Howie Hart » Sat Oct 28, 2006 9:16 am

Perhaps the bottle you opened had TCA taint?
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

26872

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: WTN: 2004 Barrister Cabernet Franc

by Jenise » Sat Oct 28, 2006 10:13 am

Haven't had it either, Clark. And, you don't describe the wine's problem, but if it was that dissatisfying perhaps you did have a tainted bottle.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
User avatar
User

Randy Buckner

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1725

Joined

Sun Mar 05, 2006 12:46 pm

Location

Puget Sound

Re: WTN: 2004 Barrister Cabernet Franc

by Randy Buckner » Sat Oct 28, 2006 11:37 am

A few points, Clark:

You didn't say why the wine was rated down -- was it out of balance? too oaky? too little fruit? possibility of cork taint?

I rated the 2002 version and found it very tasty (88 points) for a New World Cab Franc. I have not tried the wine since then. For Rahsaan -- the 2002 had a $24 SRP, the 04 is $25.

FWIW, the 2004 took a concordance gold medal at the Indy International this year which speaks well of the wine. I suspect you had an off bottle.
User avatar
User

ClarkDGigHbr

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

485

Joined

Sat May 06, 2006 8:16 pm

Location

Gig Harbor, WA

Re: WTN: 2004 Barrister Cabernet Franc

by ClarkDGigHbr » Sat Oct 28, 2006 2:23 pm

All very good questions, folks. I should have pointed out the fact that the bottle was not tainted. However, from your responses, it seems that none of you has had the opportunity to taste this wine yet.

I found the wine to be dark and lush smelling. However, upon tasting, it came across as being a dark fruit bomb with an unsatisfying finish. To me it felt overripe and over extracted. The other wines showed greater elegance and balance, although one of them was more tannic. I later recorded the fact that its alcohol level is pretty high at 14.9% ABV.

Although we specified Cabernet Franc as the varietal for the evening, we left choice of origin open. Here's the list of wines in the blind tasting, in order of finish:
    2002 Chandler Reach Parris Estate Reserve Cabernet Franc ($38 )
    2004 Owen Roe Rosa Mystica Yakima Valley Cabernet Franc ($36)
    2001 Peju Province Napa Cabernet Franc ($40)
    2005 Catherine & Pierre Breton Bourgueil Trinch (Loire, $16)
    2004 Barrister Columbia Valley Cabernet Franc ($25)


I don't believe the bottle of Barrister was a one-off problem. Rather, I think that professional reviewer liked his/her Cabernet Franc to be made to taste like a big, heady Syrah. I don't think Cab Franc should be made that way, and ended up casting my first place vote in this blind tasting for the French wine. Note, I did not bring that French wine, and tasted it for the first time during this blind tasting.

Not surprisingly, we saw very bi-polar voting on the Breton Trinch. Three of us gave it first place votes, and everyone else voted it fourth or fifth. This almost surely reflects stylistic preferences that differentiate Old World vs New World winemaking. However, in analyzing the votes, I noticed that those folks, who voted the French wine in last place, also voted the Barrister at the bottom of the New World selections.

I'm thinking that the 2004 Barrister could be an off year in terms of absolute quality, and the reviewers are simply being a bit too generous to a winery with an otherwise wonderful record.

Please do not misconstrue my intent here. I don't have anything against Barrister wines; this was the first time I even tasted one of their offerings. I was just curious about the obvious mismatch in my expectations, and the clear results from our group tasting vs the published professional review. Then again, that's why we do blind tastings.

One final note, sitting to my left that evening was a local barrister. She placed the French wine last (fifth), and the Barrister fourth (i.e. at the bottom of the New World wines). See, it wasn't just an anti-lawyer thing. :wink:

-- Clark
Last edited by ClarkDGigHbr on Sat Oct 28, 2006 4:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
User

Randy Buckner

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1725

Joined

Sun Mar 05, 2006 12:46 pm

Location

Puget Sound

Re: WTN: 2004 Barrister Cabernet Franc

by Randy Buckner » Sat Oct 28, 2006 2:33 pm

...Cabernet Franc to be made to taste like a big, heady Syrah.


Ah, the old Pinot Syrah flap, eh? Well I can certainly understand how wines on steroids can be off-putting. Some people enjoy those Tammy Faye wines though.... I'm not in that camp.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 9 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign