by Robin Garr » Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:16 pm
We tried one random test this week. I took a Riedel Chardonnay glass and a generic flute and poured a splash of a decent French bubbly, Gérard Bertrand 2012 “Cuvee Thomas Jefferson” Cremant de Limoux Brut, into each.
The flute performed its intended purpose: It’s fun to watch the sparkling wine’s lastring stream of pinpoint bubbles go swirling up the length of the tall glass to the top.
But for most of us, the primary sensory benefits of wine don’t come from looking at the stuff. Once you put your nose in the glass, the difference is obvious. The tulip-shaped glass fills with the delicate scents of green figs, dates and distant pears that highlight the Cremant de Limoux.
The flute? Meh. The tall, pipelike glass shape with its narrow aperture, just wide enough to stick your nose in, doesn’t do much to collect the aromas, showing only distant, undifferentiated white fruit. The flavor didn’t suffer so badly, but given that 90 percent of our perception of a wine comes through the nose, the battle was already lost.
(To complete the experiment, we tried a little more bubbly in an inexpensive white-wine glass from Target, which had plenty of room but lacked the turned-in upper curve of a true tulip. It was better than the flute, not as good as the true tulip glass.)