by Jenise » Fri May 12, 2017 12:51 pm
Though I cede Dave's points, up here in the Birkenstock belt a wine named 'Ethica' would speak very well to a certain mindset (while turning off others). As I'm a quality and value buyer with some knowledge of biodynamic practices, the wine name wouldn't appeal to me because I don't shop for wine based on politics--except to the extent I might boycott the products of an entire country I'm in current dislike with.
I'm close to both the wine guys at the two Food Coops in my town, and their clientele is very much the hempy/Birkenstock/Mother Jones-reading/fair trade kind of crowd. A wine like this would not do well in their stores if the quality wasn't in the bottle, even if the idea of 'Ethica' appealed to some. Basically, I think it can be said that in the U.S. message-based wines predominantly sell well to women spending under $15 a bottle. To others (like most on this board), it would be a turnoff.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov