The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: 01 Landron

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Patchen Markell

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1127

Joined

Sat Jan 16, 2016 11:18 am

Location

Ithaca, New York

WTN: 01 Landron

by Patchen Markell » Sun Jun 04, 2017 10:19 am

Last night with a mostly veg- and seafood-focused dinner, I noticed the wine list had a bunch of older vintages of Landron's Muscadets, so after consulting with the somm we went with a Domaine de la Louvetrie 2001 Muscadet Sèvre et Main Sur Lie "Le Fief du Breil." Still remarkably fresh, medium-yellow, waxy roasted pineapple up front, shifting toward drier, greener, and more rocky notes on the palate, and becoming a little spiced on the finish especially with air; there's still a core of acidity here, but with soft enough edges to let the richness of the wine come through. Shows a slightly different face with each glass and alongside each course. The combination of nearly tropical fruit with austere minerality makes this a very different expression of older Muscadet than I've encountered before (mainly from Pepière's Clos des Briords), and it's totally engaging.
cheers, Patchen
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

35805

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN: 01 Landron

by David M. Bueker » Sun Jun 04, 2017 10:41 am

Sounds good.

I have zero concept of 2001 as a vintage for the region.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Bob Parsons Alberta

Rank

aka Doris

Posts

10860

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:09 pm

Re: WTN: 01 Landron

by Bob Parsons Alberta » Sun Jun 04, 2017 11:27 am

Seeing this wine on a winelist I would be tempted too!
no avatar
User

Patchen Markell

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1127

Joined

Sat Jan 16, 2016 11:18 am

Location

Ithaca, New York

Re: WTN: 01 Landron

by Patchen Markell » Sun Jun 04, 2017 1:44 pm

I don't really either, although I recall that it was the first vintage from which I drank copious quantities of Pepière, so it couldn't have been too bad. The somm suggested the 2001 and the 2003 had both shown well recently; I didn't so much choose the 2001 as reflexively reject the 2003.
cheers, Patchen

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Amazonbot, Apple Bot, ClaudeBot, Google AgentMatch, Yandexbot and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign