The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: Haut Stuff

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

44603

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

WTN: Haut Stuff

by Jenise » Sat Oct 07, 2017 3:21 pm

Opened and poured side by side to sip on while watching the Dodger-Diamondback playoff and dining on rack of lamb (warning: gratuitous photo follows.) The intention was to only drink half of each, but OOPS.

RackofLamb.jpg


Vaudouvan crusted R of L with lemony potatoes and scorched sweet onions (yes, the scorch is deliberate).

2001 Château Barde-Haut St. Émilion Grand Cru Red Bordeaux Blend
Drank over four hours; not decanted. Effusive nose of red fruit, chocolate and tobacco. On the palate, red fruit, leather and a touch of red dirt minerality combined to radiate a kind of inner warmth, though the palate didn't fully open up until the second hour. It was the better wine with the food, and had the strongest finish. Drink over the next two years, I reckon.

2002 Château Montrose St. Estèphe Red Bordeaux Blend
Drank over four hours; not decanted. Immediately attractive blackberry and plum fruit, interesting spice, some sweetness and floral notes. Definitely the more primary of the two wines and the friendliest, at first. Faded somewhat in the second hour, but seemed to come back a bit in the fourth. However, tannins were light and the finish a bit short. Not sure what to make of longevity here; most reviews on CT think this is the end of the line. Please opine if you disagree--I have many more bottles.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

35798

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN: Haut Stuff

by David M. Bueker » Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:26 pm

My take on the CT notes: people don't like 2002 Bordeaux.

That does not surprise me.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

44603

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: WTN: Haut Stuff

by Jenise » Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:42 pm

That may be, but the three recent reviews I read aren't neccessarily by people who participate in group think. The wine was primary enough for me to question their judgement, but of course the lack of tannins are a problem--unless they're just laying low. I've been fooled before. Wish I'd saved some over to today as I'd planned to. :oops:
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

35798

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN: Haut Stuff

by David M. Bueker » Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:46 pm

Yeah, your lack of tannins comment surprised me.

I have a lot of Bordeaux to drink this winter. I need to cross check!
Decisions are made by those who show up

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Amazonbot, ByteSpider, ClaudeBot, DotBot, Google AgentMatch, Majestic-12 [Bot], Rahsaan and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign