The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21851

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by Robin Garr » Fri Sep 28, 2018 2:26 pm

(From this week's 30 Second Wine Advisor)

Is 'minerality' a word?

When I type the word "minerality" into a tasting note, spell-check invariably bites back with an angry red underline declaring that there's no such word.

This seems unfair, as I love the stony, chalky, granite, slate, clay, oystershell, or rainwater-over-rocks character that distinguishes some of the world's most subtle and interesting wines.

In an age when many wine lovers are enthusiastic about big, fruity wines that strut their stuff with layers of ripe, jammy fruit framed by oak and high alcohol, perhaps it's no surprise that these lean, minerally wines delight only a minority of wine enthusiasts that's occasionally mocked as the "anti-flavor wine elite."

These wines, often from Europe's more traditional regions like Germany's Mosel Valley, the Loire Valley and parts of the Northern Rhône, in France, Austria's Wachau region in the Danube valley, and scattered smaller regions like Spain's Priorat, don't often make the front pages of slick wine magazines or turn up in special wine shop displays.

Curiously, this style of wine has always been with us. I'd argue that it was present, and even celebrated, before fruit-forward wines became so dominant. But the word "minerality," however clearly it defines a style, is new. It isn't in dictionaries (or my spell-checker), and wasn't listed in wine encyclopedias as recently as the 1980s. It's not included in Ann Noble's beloved Wine Aroma Wheel (1984) or in any of the respected wine scientist Emile Peynaud's books.

My old Frank Schoonmaker Encyclopedia of Wine, a 1988 update of a 1975 classic that was pretty much my personal Wine 101 course, has no entry for minerality, but we can find its definition in the familiar French term terroir, which was also beginning a shift in understanding during those years. "Terroir (tair-wah'r): French for "soil" or "earth," used in a very special sense in the phrase gout de terroir or "taste of the soil," Schoonmaker wrote.

Indeed, for many years even many wine makers and wine scientists assumed that "terroir" represented actual flavors of the soil, taken up through the grapevine's roots into the grapes. Thus we perceive flavors of slate in the Mosel or Priorat, granite in the northern Rhone, gneiss in the Wachau, chalk in Chablis and the Loire Valley, and so it went.

This made so much sense that it was easy to believe, but more modern science has thoroughly debunked it. The 2017 article Minerality Myths, by Master of Wine Sally Easton, offers a quick, clear overview of modern thinking on the matter.

Easton quoted Alex Maltman, professor of earth sciences at Aberystwyth University, observing that minerals in the soil are "not necessarily bio-available." Moreover, "minerals do not vaporise – they are odourless, and their concentration in wine is far below the taste threshold."

Easton also cited Dr. Wendy Parr, a sensory scientist from Lincoln University in New Zealand, who concluded that much of the perception of minerality is "top-down perception, that is, what's already in our heads – memory, experience. For example, you can see Chablis on the label and you already have expectations."

So, in short, when we confront with delight a wine that clearly seems to reveal elements of chalk, granite, slate or clay or even that delightful rainwater-on-rocks petrichor, what exactly are we tasting?

Right now, I'm looking at yeast effects. The yeast that converts grape sugars into alcohol and thus elevates grape juice into wine acts in mysterious ways, and it's no secret that yeast can have a profound impact on wine flavor.

That goes double with wines like the Muscadet Sèvre et Maine featured in today's tasting, below, which undergo the sur lie ("on the lees") vinification, with the wine left to age on the lees – dead yeast sediment – rather than the usual process of being siphoned off immediately after fermentation. This long lees contact adds distinct character to the wine, and it's easily read as chalk or stone. Combine that with a wine region on chalky soil, and it's easy to detect a distinct chalk character, even if there's not a molecule of chalk present.

Wine is mysterious that way, isn't it? My tasting report is here.
no avatar
User

Bob Parsons Alberta

Rank

aka Doris

Posts

10860

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:09 pm

Re: Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by Bob Parsons Alberta » Fri Sep 28, 2018 4:39 pm

In some circles, mentioning "terroir" is like a red rag to a bull!
no avatar
User

Victorwine

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

2031

Joined

Thu May 18, 2006 9:51 pm

Re: Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by Victorwine » Sat Sep 29, 2018 8:58 am

Robin wrote;
Wine is mysterious that way, isn't it?

When over 800 different odorant molecules could hit your nose in a single deep sniff any thing is possible.

Salute
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21851

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by Robin Garr » Sat Sep 29, 2018 3:24 pm

Victorwine wrote:When over 800 different odorant molecules could hit your nose in a single deep sniff any thing is possible.

Isn't that the truth, Victor! I'm surprised in a way that it's only 800. :)
no avatar
User

Tim York

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

4968

Joined

Tue May 09, 2006 2:48 pm

Location

near Lisieux, France

Re: Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by Tim York » Sun Sep 30, 2018 5:29 am

The answer to the question is "yes". "Minerality" as a word appears in the Oxford English Dictionary where it is qualified as rare with a first recorded use dating from the 19th Century.

I agree that its use as well as the use of "mineral" in TNs is quite recent and I'm pretty certain that it was not used in the wine books which helped to nurture my wine interest by authors like André Simon, Warner Allen, Alexis Lichine as well as Frank Schoonmaker. I also think that "minéral" is quite recent in French wine writing. If I can find my Larousse du Vin from about 1970, I will be able to date that more precisely.

Personally I find it a very useful descriptor and also find it utterly irrelevant whether or not an actual uptake of minerals into wine can be demonstrated.

All sorts of fruit, flower and animal descriptors appear in TNs, e.g. cherry, nuts, olive, bacon and wool, without anyone feeling the need to prove actual traces of the same in the wine, so why should it be different with minerals?
Tim York
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21851

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by Robin Garr » Sun Sep 30, 2018 7:17 am

Tim York wrote:Personally I find it a very useful descriptor and also find it utterly irrelevant whether or not an actual uptake of minerals into wine can be demonstrated.

All sorts of fruit, flower and animal descriptors appear in TNs, e.g. cherry, nuts, olive, bacon and wool, without anyone feeling the need to prove actual traces of the same in the wine, so why should it be different with minerals?

Well said, Tim! The most important issue to me is that I generally like the wines that invite this descriptor, whether we call it minerality or used to call it terroir. :)

As for the OED, correct, but note that "rare." The word is not in most regular dictionaries, and to the point, my spell-check tells me that I'm making a misteak.
no avatar
User

Victorwine

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

2031

Joined

Thu May 18, 2006 9:51 pm

Re: Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by Victorwine » Sun Sep 30, 2018 8:39 am

Since winemakers (by law) aren't allowed to artificully add flavors, I would think most serious wine geeks are somewhat curious about how that flavor got into the wine. Take "bacon" for instance, researches have discovered certain strains of "wild yeast" (Brett) could be responsible.

Salute
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

35787

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by David M. Bueker » Sun Sep 30, 2018 11:43 am

Robin Garr wrote:As for the OED, correct, but note that "rare." The word is not in most regular dictionaries, and to the point, my spell-check tells me that I'm making a misteak.


Two things:

1. Any number of ridiculous things get added to the dictionary each year. Minerality may be cited as rare, but at least it makes sense outide of texting a BFF. :twisted:

2. I hope that last word in your post was intentional. If not, I would find a new spell check, perhaps one that recognizes minerality.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21851

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by Robin Garr » Sun Sep 30, 2018 12:44 pm

David M. Bueker wrote:]2. I hope that last word in your post was intentional.

Fully. :twisted:

If not, I would find a new spell check, perhaps one that recognizes minerality.

Good point!
no avatar
User

Steve Slatcher

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1047

Joined

Sat Aug 19, 2006 11:51 am

Location

Manchester, England

Re: Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by Steve Slatcher » Mon Oct 01, 2018 4:46 am

The main problem for me is that "minerality" means many different things to different people. It is not even agreed whether it is an aroma, taste or texture. So use it if you want to, but do not expect readers to understanding the sense in which you use the word. And bear this in mind when you are reading notes too. The same is indeed true of other terms in tasting notes, but I think "minerality" is extreme in its range of meanings and in how often it is used.

I also wonder how tasting note authors managed to survive before the term appeared in the late 1990s. Was there a change in wines about then? If not, how did they describe wines with "minerality"? Or was their language lacking in that era, and is now so much more expressive?
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

35787

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by David M. Bueker » Mon Oct 01, 2018 6:28 am

They used to just talk about acidity.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21851

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by Robin Garr » Mon Oct 01, 2018 8:14 am

David M. Bueker wrote:They used to just talk about acidity.

I'm sticking with the hypothesis that terroir (or gout de terroir for the fancy) shifted to minerality when people figured out that terroir meant something broader.
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

35787

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by David M. Bueker » Mon Oct 01, 2018 8:58 am

Perhaps, but minerality is almost always an expression of acidity.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21851

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by Robin Garr » Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:30 am

David M. Bueker wrote:Perhaps, but minerality is almost always an expression of acidity.

I never thought of it that way, but it's worth thinking about. I'm pretty confident in the terroir to minerality shift, though, because I've seen the change occur, and participated in it. Could be both? Probably. But I can definitely think of acidic wines that in my opinion didn't show minerality, and minerally wines that weren't obviously high in acid, so ... it's complicated.
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

35787

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by David M. Bueker » Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:49 am

Different types of acids...

Terroir is indeed too broad. It's just a shorthand for "I know where that wine comes from."
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21851

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by Robin Garr » Mon Oct 01, 2018 10:11 am

David M. Bueker wrote:Different types of acids...

Good point ...

Terroir is indeed too broad. It's just a shorthand for "I know where that wine comes from."

Right! But that's now. This was then. Look at that Schoonmaker quote, and remember that when I got tapped to write a newspaper wine column in 1981 and didn't know much about wine, Schoonmaker and Johnson were really my gurus, and Peynaud for the geek stuff. "Gout de terroir" really did mean pretty much what "minerality" does now, and it was "terroir" for short. People started questioning whether terroir shouldn't be broader than just "taste of the soil" probably around the same time this forum first got started on ancient software in the middle 1990s. All of this is just historical, of course ...
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

35787

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by David M. Bueker » Mon Oct 01, 2018 10:27 am

Yet "terroir" is going back to the dirt these days. Many folks realize that it was improperly broadened to include too many factors. It became useless. There are still a few people who try to further broaden it (there was a thread elsewhere earlier this year trying to add winemaking to terroir...might as well go all the way!), but it's normally just an attempt to justify production practices that they like that are not traditional to the process.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21851

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by Robin Garr » Mon Oct 01, 2018 11:26 am

More for me to think about! :) When people started talking about terroir as more than dirt, it made sense to me if it remained limited to the particular circumstances affecting the character of wines from grapes grown in a particular place: Dirt, sun exposure, winds, slope, yada whatnot. That sort of made sense. But I guess it's vague enough that there's always going to be room for debate. And maybe back to dirt? But then what will we do with minerality? Send it back where it came from?
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

35787

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by David M. Bueker » Mon Oct 01, 2018 12:55 pm

FWIW, I subscribe to a somewhat broader interpretation of terroir. Climate has to play a part, otherwise I could scoop up the top 30 feet of soil in Charmes Chambertain, move it to Indiana, locate a similar slope gradient, and lay down the dirt.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21851

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: Wine Advisor: Is ‘minerality’ a word?

by Robin Garr » Mon Oct 01, 2018 2:34 pm

David M. Bueker wrote:FWIW, I subscribe to a somewhat broader interpretation of terroir. Climate has to play a part, .

Absolutely. That was my oversight not to mention it along with winds and sun exposure.

.
otherwise I could scoop up the top 30 feet of soil in Charmes Chambertain, move it to Indiana, locate a similar slope gradient, and lay down the dirt.

Now I'm kind of surprised that no one has done that ... :twisted:

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Amazon, Amazonbot, ClaudeBot, Google AgentMatch and 1 guest

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign