Tom NJ
That awful Tom fellow
1240
Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:06 pm
Northerm NJ, USA
Robin Garr wrote:It doesn't surprise me, Tom, but at this point I'm not sure how much to worry about it. Naturally news coverage is polarized.![]()
Here's an "Oh, the horror" story from an environmental group:
http://winewaterwatch.org/2018/02/round ... es-tested/
Here's a "don't worry, folks" story from the California wine industry trade organization Wine Institute:
https://www.wineinstitute.org/the-facts
Fair and balanced? You decide.
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
35717
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Tom NJ
That awful Tom fellow
1240
Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:06 pm
Northerm NJ, USA
Robin Garr wrote:It doesn't surprise me, Tom, but at this point I'm not sure how much to worry about it. Naturally news coverage is polarized.![]()
Here's an "Oh, the horror" story from an environmental group:
http://winewaterwatch.org/2018/02/round ... es-tested/
Here's a "don't worry, folks" story from the California wine industry trade organization Wine Institute:
https://www.wineinstitute.org/the-facts
Fair and balanced? You decide.
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
35717
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Victorwine wrote:"Drinking a lot of industrial, central valley supermarket wines......."
A lot???? Over a 140 glasses a day over 70 years just to reach the level that the California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment has deemed as “No Significant Risk Level”
Salute
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
35717
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Paul Winalski
Wok Wielder
8851
Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:16 pm
Merrimack, New Hampshire
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
35717
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Paul Winalski wrote:Roundup is a lot less toxic than Bordeaux mixture, the old-school traditional treatment for rot, mildew, and oidium.
-Paul W.
Users browsing this forum: Babbar, ClaudeBot, FB-extagent, Google AgentMatch, Mark Lipton and 0 guests