The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

Winery Notes: Charles Krug and Ballentine

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Brian K Miller

Rank

Passionate Arboisphile

Posts

9340

Joined

Fri Aug 25, 2006 1:05 am

Location

Northern California

Winery Notes: Charles Krug and Ballentine

by Brian K Miller » Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:21 am

I visited Charles Krug today for the first time, and I have to say I was overall rather impressed. This seems to be a rather old fashioned winery-definitely not a cult producer, but....

Very low key tasting room-no Napa glitz here, almost shabby. Quite a personable tasting room crew-a bit of a performance, but at heart quite nice people.

Some of the highlights included:

Napa Valley Chardonnay (2005) with just a touch-a touch, mind you, of oak, that was quite refreshing with green apple, pineapple, and tropical fruit, quite a nice hit of acidity. The pourer suggested this would be a good "salad" wine and he is right. Great QPR-$20 for a Chardonnay I preferred to many more expensive bottles. Not a complex blockbuster, but with summer coming...***1/2

The 2005 Sauvignon Blanc was nice-steel fermented, a blast of grapefruit and other citrus. This is one of the very few occasions I actually preferred the Chardonnay, but still solid ***.

2005 Carneros Pinot Noir. I just don't like the big names in Carneros Pinot Noir, like Acacia and Etude etc. I simply don't like that floral character. THIS Pinot Noir had some Russian River fruit in it (still under 25%) that added some very appealing mushroomy, earthy notes. I actually liked this Pinot quite a bit Solid ***

Napa Valley Merlot (2004). The one wine that failed for me-the only one that tasted like the stereotypical Napa fruit bomb. Too much bright fruit up front-will this ever develop secondary characteristics? Also more oak tastable here. Not flawed in any way, but not to my taste at all. *

Yountville Cabernet 2004 Their first "appellation specific" wine, this was a lovely lean, austere, but not annoyingly green Cabernet. Not over the top at all, but there is definitely some nice blackberry and cassis fruit tones here. I bet this will develop seconday savoriness very quickly-it's there just under the surface. MOST IMPORTANTLY-NO NASTY VANILLA OR CARAMEL ON THIS TASTING!!!! :!: No, it's not First (or even Fourth) growth Bordeaux, but it's a very nice quaffer. For $26, this is a nice wine. ***1/2 or ****

Also hit Ballantine for the first time. Very low key place-not a palace of wine. Pleasant pourer.

The Sauvignon Blanc was a monster, with a lot of flavor but a little rich for my tastes. **

The Block 11 Zinfandel was actually not jammy at all-pretty balanced tasting with some savory notes. 16.5% abv labelled. It didn't taste hot, but will this wine make you woozy? Wow. Not sure how to rate thi-is it a port???

The Petit Verdot bottling (2004) was quite enjoyable. Interesting sour cherry and floral notes on both the palette and the nose. A bit pricey ($38.00), but interesting enough to buy ***

Their first Cab, from estate grapes, was a disappointment. OAK IS AN ELEMENT, NOT THE PRIMARY REASON FOR MAKING A RED WINE! $60, too. I would rather drink Charles Krug, even their cheap basic bottling. *
...(Humans) are unique in our capacity to construct realities at utter odds with reality. Dogs dream and dolphins imagine, but only humans are deluded. –Jacob Bacharach

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, ClaudeBot, Google IPMatch, LACNIC bot and 3 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign