Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
Jeff B
Champagne Lover
2160
Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:01 pm
Michigan (perhaps more cleverly known as "The Big Mitten")
Jay Labrador
J-Lab's in da house!
1335
Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:34 am
Manila, Philippines
Jeff B wrote:What wine/grape/region do you not "get"?
David M. Bueker
Riesling Guru
34424
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
David M. Bueker wrote:I despise 99.9% of Sauvignon Blanc. I cannot see why anyone would drink them.
Sam Platt
I am Sam, Sam I am
2330
Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:22 pm
Indiana, USA
Howie Hart
The Hart of Buffalo
6389
Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:13 pm
Niagara Falls, NY
Jeff B
Champagne Lover
2160
Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:01 pm
Michigan (perhaps more cleverly known as "The Big Mitten")
Steve Slatcher
Wine guru
1047
Sat Aug 19, 2006 11:51 am
Manchester, England
Jon Peterson
The Court Winer
2981
Sat Apr 08, 2006 5:53 pm
The Blue Crab State
Rahsaan wrote:There are wines that I don't like as much as others, but I'm not sure I don't 'get' them. I mean I can usually see why other people might like them.
Jeff B wrote:At least there has been no mention of champagne yet, so all replies have been appreciated...
Jeff
Jay Labrador wrote:I agree with you on Sauvignon Blanc. Viognier is another one I don't get.
Jay Labrador
J-Lab's in da house!
1335
Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:34 am
Manila, Philippines
Brian Gilp wrote:Jay Labrador wrote:I agree with you on Sauvignon Blanc. Viognier is another one I don't get.
I never liked Viognier until I tried Cold Heaven http://www.coldheavencellars.com/. This is not the big, lush, oily style of Viognier. The 2010 are especially nice with the Sanford and Benedict showing the best. Not sure if you can get them or if its even worth it to you to try but this is one wine that may help you understand, it did for me.
Jeff B wrote:At least there has been no mention of champagne yet, so all replies have been appreciated...
Jeff
Jeff B
Champagne Lover
2160
Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:01 pm
Michigan (perhaps more cleverly known as "The Big Mitten")
Joy Lindholm wrote:Jeff B wrote:At least there has been no mention of champagne yet, so all replies have been appreciated...
Jeff
Jeff-
Not to be a pot-stirrer, but one thing I don't get about Champagne is why people are so obsessed with the big Champagne houses, when you can buy much superior (IMO) RM Champagnes for much better values. Why buy massed-produced when you can have very small production, hand-crafted, family owned-estate Champagne that carries with it so much soul?
The exception I could see might be some of the very old Champagnes you have mentioned from the big houses in another post. Personally, I have not had the pleasure of tasting a Champagne much older than the early 90s, so I can't speak to the super-aged stuff.
Joy Lindholm wrote:For me, wine is very much an integral part of mealtime, so I don't get the obsession with over-ripe, flabby, overblown alcoholic wines that smother food from any region or grape. This rules out 95% of what comes from Australia and California. The one region most befuddling to me though, is Napa, and the obsession people have with it. I have tasted some very good wines from Napa, if the winemaker understands how to show restraint. What I don't get is how people are still duped to buy stupidly overpriced, very lush wines that have no nuance other than explosive fruit and oak, because they think they must hold on to the status symbol that "Napa is everything" and they want to impress their friends.
Another thing I don't get are people who say "I only drink Cab".
Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot and 2 guests